Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150
From: Bryce Utting (butting_at_ihug.co.nz)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question."
- Previous message: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists"
- In reply to: TimC: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Next in thread: cl: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:34:32 +0000 (UTC)
TimC <tconnors@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 at 01:37 GMT, Brian Eable (aka Bruce)
> was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
>> Come off it George. You crossposted your extremely important thread to
>> all these newsgroups:
>>
>> alt.christnet.philosophy, alt.philosophy, alt.religion.kibology,
>> sci.physics.relativity, alt.sci.physics.new-theories
>>
>> You can't unilaterally decide the rules of all those groups, just
>> because you posted there. You've got your own moderated group where
>> you can do what you like. If you post to unmoderated groups, you
>> aren't in charge.
>
> Because this is alt.religion.kibology, can I be demanding that you to
> please to be more of teh funn'i?
insisting [HAMMOND] make sense IS teh funn'i!
butting
- Next message: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: Four-Velocity and four-acceleration question."
- Previous message: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: 7 problems with usenet aether theorists"
- In reply to: TimC: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Next in thread: cl: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]