Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150 <<Blasphemy!
From: xeno (xeno_at_transbay.net)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: K.E. and momentum"
- Previous message: Jeany: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150 <<Blasphemy!"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150 <<Blasphemy!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:46:12 -0800
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, George Hammond wrote:
>>> [Hammond]
>>> You've got the cart before the horse. Experimental fact is the horse,
>>> and Philosophy is the cart.
>> Your horse is dead, so don't expect it to pull any carts anywhere by
>> beating it. If what you call God didn't exist before the universe nor
>> initialize the process of creation but was created along with the creation
>> then your God is a superfluous explanation for the existence of things.
>> Just go back to the drawing board, George.
> [Hammond]
> He wasn't created "along with" the Creation.... he CAUSED
> the creation by sewlf-creating himself.... and the Universe....
> and Man.....along with himself.
Well, George, this bootstrapping of existence is still an effect w/o a
cause. If the alleged self-creation of God can be an effect w/o a cause,
so could the universe itself. Therefore, God as an explanation for the
existence of things is superfluous. ( & your claim that "man" was created
at the beginning of time is completely groundless).
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: K.E. and momentum"
- Previous message: Jeany: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150 <<Blasphemy!"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150 <<Blasphemy!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|