Re: Letter to Dirk Van de moortel

From: GR_GR (nyb_at_colorado.edu)
Date: 03/04/05 

Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 13:27:44 -0700

César Sirvent wrote:
>>SR can handle accelerating frames just fine without resorting to GR.
>>Read Hartle for more information.
>
>
> I read Hartle long time ago. I much prefer Wald and MTW's Gravitation.

FIne.

> As I said, most of modern relativists consider that the twin paradox is
> solvable in SR.

Do you agree?

> They are refering, of course, to the mathematical aspect, which was never an
> issue until Dingle entered into scene.
> Always the problem lied into the physical aspect of the problem, which is
> what is now being ignored.

I guess that is a "no".

> It would be interesting you would consider what my point of view is instead
> of attacking it without additional info, as it is demanded by the scientific
> method.

Post your idea then.
However, from the responses of others on this group, it seems that your
ideas are flawed.
I will reserve judgment on the validity of that impression until I have
seen your idea, in its full mathematical formalism.

Quantcast