Re: Moonbeams Shine on Einstein, Galileo and Newton
xxein_at_bellsouth.net
Date: 03/06/05
- Next message: chosp: "Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations"
- Previous message: Todd: "Re: SR math help with rotating cylinder"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Moonbeams Shine on Einstein, Galileo and Newton"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Moonbeams Shine on Einstein, Galileo and Newton"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Moonbeams Shine on Einstein, Galileo and Newton"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 5 Mar 2005 18:35:47 -0800
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> <xxein@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1109990559.509565.234800@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > baalke@earthlink.net wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > More information about the research is available online at
> > > http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0411113 or
> > > http://funphysics.jpl.nasa.gov/physics/index.html .
> > >
> > > The research was conducted under NASA's Astronomy and Physics
> > > Research and Analysis program, part of the agency's Science
> > > Mission Directorate, Washington, D.C. JPL, is a division of the
> > > California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
> > >
> > > -end-
> >
> > xxein: Bssically says nothing at all except that they want more
money
> > to confirm the confirmed with more ($) accuracy.
> >
> > This is where we are not supposed to believe the intricate math of
the
> > best theories of man's mind that go beyond the accuracy of the
proposed
> > new experiments that they want more money for.
> >
> > Gimme a break!
>
> A break is not what you need.
> A brain is what you need.
>
> Dirk Vdm
xxein: Yah, let's send an intergalactic probe to prove
1+1=============2.
You can't expect G to change in decayears when we have hardly a hint
that it MIGHT change in billions of years with universal expansion.
So, ok, we can express some doubt in our theories. Where are you in
this? Do you allow the thought that some 'ether' theory may be correct
or do you say that we have proven to finality that 'ether' cannot
exist?
If the latter, then you have proven my point. If the former, then you
cannot profess anything except a belief with no completeness of
physical understanding.
It's your choice. Make it.
- Next message: chosp: "Re: Models. predictions, physicallity, and observations"
- Previous message: Todd: "Re: SR math help with rotating cylinder"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Moonbeams Shine on Einstein, Galileo and Newton"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Moonbeams Shine on Einstein, Galileo and Newton"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Moonbeams Shine on Einstein, Galileo and Newton"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|