Re: new improved facts v01

From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 03/08/05 

Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:31:02 GMT

 Paulps:
>
>"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
>news:slrnd2p7sg.d2q.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
>> Paulps:
>> >"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
>>
>> [??]:
>> >> > > What does an acccelerating charge effect then.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is that a question?
>> >
>> >Yes as I have been asking it for some time it feels.
>>
>> OK, the answer is: other charges and in particular the ones
>> involved in accelerating it.
>>
>
>So what is the radiating component effecting then? you have perhaps avoid
>dealing with the difficult direction?
 
  Radiating component of what and why is there some problem with
direction?
 
>Or the lost energy going ? and what is it going into? try answering the
>question or a don't know will be fine and might gain you a little respect.
 
  So far, I have no idea what that question is supposed to mean
that differs from any other charge, accelerated or not. Charges
affect other charges. That's why we say some particles are charged
and some are not. Charge doesn't affect uncharged particles.

>You started of by calling me a Pratt so now you demonstrate that you aren't
>because otherwise we will continue to all Pratt together?
 
  I have no idea what ``Pratt'' is, so it's rather hard to figure
out how I could have called you that or why.

[...]
>> Those are all acceptable reasons for asking questions. What isn't
>> acceptable is objecting to the answers without knowing any more than
>> you did when asking the question, just to be contrary.
>>
>
>No my objection was that I do not believe the answers are correct and that
>is why you got annoyed was because I did not believe your answers.
 
  Well, I can only judge what is correct by how well a calculation
agrees with experiment and since there are no disagreements between
qed and any experiment, my judgement is that qed gives the correct
answers. That's how science works.

[...]
>>
>> Now, if you could just forget to post a response which higlights
>> those issues in a gratuitously contary fashion, everyone would be
>> set.
>>
>They are not gratuitously contary they are my objections to what
>appears to me as somebody trying to con me and I can get
 
  If you think you're being conned, then why are you posting here?
You have already decided not to accept what anyone tells you nor
study any physics, so assuming that you are trolling is an accurate
assumption.
 
>very irritated with this treatment and if you look back though all my
>posting you I think and hope, that it was others or you who became
>insulting when I didnt except your answers like a good little boy.
 
  No, I became insulting when it became obvious you were just trolling
in an effort to get people to waste their time by taking you seriously.
Deceiving people into wasting their time is considerable more rude than
calling someone an ass for doing so.

>> Then why do you spend all of your effort being contrary for the sake of
>> being contrary. A new form of performance art?
>>
>
>This is your problem you think your right and all the others are idiot
 
  So long as you act like an idiot and make no attempt to understand
any physics, I'm perfectly justified in holding that opinion.
 
>I have the same problem but hopefully have learned to control it a
>little see I'm still posting to as you are to me but you appear to be a
>lot more pompous than I hope I am appearing to you in fact.
>I try and make point of not being pompous which you then jump on as
>idiocy..

[...]
>for
>> >wave propagation?
>>
>> How come?
>
>So what is a none balistic event supposed to exist in? you failed to answer
>this question at the start of this post remember?
 
  What is a ``none ballistic event?'' Not only is that phrase meaningless,
it's not even a valid grammatical construct. Write an equation that says
explicitly what you mean.

[...]
>> >
>> >Consideration of medium not needed in most local equations. Bow down to
>> >Maxwell.
>>
>> In which equations is a medium needed?
>>
>
>NOT in most local, are you deaf.
 
  What does ``NOT in most local'' mean? Perhaps you should make some
effort to write complete sentences and punctuate them correctly. I've
had an easier time ``conversing'' with chinese students that had been
in the us less than a day and who spoke no english _at_ all (and I
don't speak chinese, either). If you have no interest in making your-
self understood, then I have even less interest in figuring out what
you mean.

[...]
>> >Done that (see above) its only in use in local applications of
>equations?
>> >bit old <1900
>>
>> Oh really? Could you please reference an article on quantum field
>> theory written before 1900?
>>
>
>Conceptually. trying the heavy data move? and try answering some real
>questions like
>its only in use in local applications of equations?
 
  Come back when you decide to write something cogent.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: An explanation of the origin of inertia of a body
    ... The inertia of a particle is explained by considering the electrodynamic ... inertial force equal and opposite to the accelerating force. ... Charge and mass are not proportional. ... The 5.4x10^relative decrement or increment in mass (electron mass ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Im Not Sure if this Worries Me or Not.
    ... A charge cannot be made to move at>c between the plates of a condensor (which ... It requires infinfite energy to raise its speed to c wrt those plates. ... to the particle every time the particle passes through it, ... it cannot cancel the accelerating field. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: EP and acceleration
    ... in the box so that other people can see the charge. ... travel with you, they don't see radiation, if they don't, ... saying that observers outside the accelerating box will see the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Henry Family
    ... I agree partly with both "Sherlock" and Carmel's previous posting. ... available through the County Genealogy Centres are mainly the Church baptism ... I dont know what the other various County Centres charge, ... Son and Daughter of James Henery and Jane Brown. ...
    (soc.genealogy.ireland)
  • Re: GB machin decimal postal rates
    ... > The jpg you show is a purely a certificate of posting ... > This is not the postal charge, but an additional charge made by the Post ... > you did post, incase of loss, a driving licence, bill payment or ...
    (rec.collecting.stamps.discuss)