Re: new improved facts v01

From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 03/08/05 

Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:51:43 GMT

"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message news:slrnd2rmd7.d2q.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
> Paulps:
> >
> >"Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
> >news:slrnd2qur5.d2q.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
> >> Paulps:

[snip]

> >>
> >> >Or the lost energy going ? and what is it going into? try answering the
> >> >question or a don't know will be fine and might gain you a little
> >> >respect.
> >>
> >> So far, I have no idea what that question is supposed to mean
> >> that differs from any other charge, accelerated or not. Charges
> >> affect other charges. That's why we say some particles are charged
> >> and some are not. Charge doesn't affect uncharged particles.
> >>
> >
> >What are uncharged partical charged by? please answer in new improved facts
> >v011 because you may have a point.
>
> Uncharged particles aren't charged by anything. If they were charged,
> they would be different particles.

Perhaps, using his definition, he means to say that they
are charged with absence of normal or previous content.

Dirk Vdm