Re: Flaw in Stowe/LeSage Heating

From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 03/09/05


Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:34:42 GMT


"TC" <tclarke@ist.ucf.edu> wrote in message news:1110340036.670638.58520@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> mingstb@sim-ss.com wrote:
> > TC wrote:
> > > mingstb@sim-ss.com wrote:
> > > > TC wrote:
> > > > > Paul Stowe wrote:
> > >
> > > Snip....as Mingst has tagged in
> mingstb@sim-ss.com wrote:
> > TC wrote:
> > > mingstb@sim-ss.com wrote:
> > > > TC wrote:
> > > > > Paul Stowe wrote:
>
> > > Snip....as Mingst has tagged in
>
> > Putting back the context of the discussion:
>
> Sigh. Why? It just clutters up the post.
> The context is clear enough.

The idea is to put up a smokescreen so you give up.
Previous examples of this particular Mingst tactic.
#14 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=Q_hAd.35825$Bw5.29564@news.flashnewsgroups.com
#13 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=1090870ihgt6p5f@corp.supernews.com
#12 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vuh3v912ilk51f@corp.supernews.com
#11 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vm1fb4d1hqc897@corp.supernews.com
#10 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=6ffd15bd.0308191548.79f09a30@posting.google.com
#9 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vibm42507ohma5@corp.supernews.com
#8 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vhtma4hh0cs0ac@corp.supernews.com
#7 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vhm4f6rucptia4@corp.supernews.com
#6 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vg0ndom3o5ihcd@corp.supernews.com
#5 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vfrn4g1rmj1gbd@corp.supernews.com
#4 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vfrlt15m8qus68@corp.supernews.com
#3 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vfgtonnqejtf29@corp.supernews.com
#2 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vfem054fm2dk78@corp.supernews.com
#1 http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&as_umsgid=vemlos4174kffa@corp.supernews.com

Enjoy :-)
Dirk Vdm



Relevant Pages

  • Re: quite an achievement
    ... Sigh. ... that low scores may be down to poor batting, good bowling, poor pitches ... norm is the norm in context, ... The truth is Oakman was not thought of as a Test bowler. ...
    (uk.sport.cricket)
  • Re: quite an achievement
    ... Sigh. ... Context, context, context! ... or occasional international players; a few promising youngsters. ... by changes in equipment and track surfaces and drugs. ...
    (uk.sport.cricket)
  • Re: [newbie] need advice on div layout
    ... the CSS. ... As recently pointed out by Ben in another context, the default is auto, ... *sigh* Yes, I believe I just saw this in the last week. ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets)
  • Re: [newbie] need advice on div layout
    ... the CSS. ... As recently pointed out by Ben in another context, the default is auto, ... *sigh* Yes, I believe I just saw this in the last week. ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets)
  • Re: Good News for Aggy
    ... Stop quoting out of context you dissembling lying prostitute. ... Aggy, (sigh). ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)