new improved facts v012

From: Paulps (paulpsremove_at_freeuk.com)
Date: 03/09/05 

Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:23:18 -0000

*See Appendix at the end of this post if you have any difficulty in
understanding the context and meaning of words used in this text.*

Preferred common dictionary definitions used in this text.

>From the Oxford paperback Dictionary.
Vacuum:- Absence of normal or previous content.
Medium:- An agency or means by which something is done.
>From the Oxford Physics Dictionary
Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR):-Energy resulting from the acceleration of
electric charge.

Some simple provable facts.

a) Without something the energy of an accelerating charge has nothing to
transfer to see c) below
b) The vacuum will support the effects of a changing charge in the form of
EMR..
c) Light is EMR requiring a supporting medium. What is its supporting medium
if not vacuum? (note:- if your answer is nothing or not needed please read
to end of
post before replying)
Purcel claims that magnetism and feilds lines are a result of the effect
of length contraction cause by moving charges but as far as I can discover
he does not clearly define what field lines are in perhaps sombody would
like to clarify this points?.
Perhaps they magically appear in vacuum or even gasses and solids ?
or perhaps more rational they appear in the medium of vacuum as a modulation
of it.?
I can see that many must have a problem when as far as I can find
out the educational definition for charge is "it just is" and the same
for mass and pretty much the same for feild all that is sugested is
that you measure the effects and that must make the understanding complete?
I bring this point up again in j). This text is an attempt to explain what
these things are, not by some mathematical fabrication but from a
conceptual base that expands into a mathematical description.
d) The speed of light (SOL) is currently observed to be fairly constant in
the medium of vacuum and as such is used as a constant.
e) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source.
f) The SOL is currently always measured at c due to procedural and equipment
limitations (03-03-2005).
g) The fact of spectral shift as a product of Doppler shift is proof of a
velocity differences in the vacuum in the observation process so as to
preserve the constancy of c and energy.
h) The observer can from observation of the deviation frequency (spectral
shift) of light with a known frequency, determine their velocity with
respect to the vacuum and other sources with respect to the vacuum
that the light is constant in by a spectrophotometer and computation, in
most cases.
i) In some cases the effects of what has been called time dilation and its
associated length compression and the gravity gradient need to be included
in the computations but this is a another kettle of fish not dealt with in
this version.
j) Many of the examples posted to this group and in establishment books fail
to take account of the above facts and can be misleading both in concept and
formulation.

Simplified procedure to determine simplified observer velocity relative to
vacuum:-

Find source spectral shift = Ss
Find source velocity from Ss to = Sv
Find observer rotational velocity = Orv
Find observer orbital velocity = Oov
Observer velocity relative to the medium of vacuum = c-Sv-Orv-Oov
Perform above on three axis.
Find vector sum = Velocity of observer relative to vacuum.
Find velocity of me relative to local vacuum = ~0 = a clue

This means that the velocity of any observer at a considerable
distance from three reference sources may be able to find there
velocity relative to the main body of vacuum and this velocity
may be different for each observer.
This does not mean that in a local sense the measured velocity
of light will be other than c as locally matter/particles modifies the
velocity of the vacuum in its vicinity as does a magnetic field and
gravity which are themselves a byproduce of matter which is itself a
product of modulated vacuum.

Speculation:-

The characteristics and coefficient of a vacuum are very small and
can probable be worked out from cosmic red shift (CRS), entropy and orbital
decay etc although any cosmic expansion found may have to be factored in.
If the coefficient of vacuum was zero EMR would have no brakes and its
velocity would be infinite what are the brakes and what are they made of.
I dont think this has been clearly explained by your education?.
I may have come across this in relation to zero point energy although
I think it most probable that what we see as zero Kelvin is in fact an
offset from a base that may not yet have been detected. Some of the
reasoning behind this view is that to modulate a charge onto vacuum
with more than one half cycle you need an offset otherwise you cannot
produce a negative half cycle.
The modulation being by contraction/dilation of the vacuum which is pointed
to on a larger scale by the Lorenz transforms and the Space-time gravity of
Einstein although some tweaking of the formulas used maybe
required to improve their accuracy in some cases.
To be able to view solids from a one dimensional perspective it seems
to require at least 4 spatial dimensions plus one of time and one
of duration as a bare minimum, interrogating the state of matter may
require more.
Something somebody said suggests that to evalute anything accuratly you need
three frames at least, the source frame, the vacuum/medium frame and the
observer frame.

Additional information:-

1) The velocity and spectral frequency of the source can be determined by
observing a binary pair or a single star from a point on the earth that
doesn't contribute
any additional velocity to the observation (or the earth motion can be
calculated out). Once the velocity and spectral frequencies have been
determined for the source and with the knowledge that the SOL in vacuum is
known and that the SOL is independent of the source. The spectral shift due
to the earth's motion will allow you to calculate the earth's velocity in
relation to the vacuum in the vicinity of the observation in which the
light travelled and with some confidence all the way back to the source.
2) The argument that light shows particle characteristic in some cases
does not disprove the fact that light is a wave function in a medium it just
demonstrates the similarity of wave functions to particles, in some cases.
3) Particles are themselves a more complex form of wave function in the
medium of vacuum but with characteristics modified by their complexity, one
characteristic being ballistic. To characterise particles and their actions
is a complex business prone to error and can be very expensive and
not included in this version .
4) If you have any commonly used equations that you feel are central to
your belief that demand an absence of a medium for EMR, please post
and I will try and work it through with you.
5) If you have any trouble with these facts please post details and
references.
6) Anybody that thinks they know what the characteristics of a vacuum are,
please post as it will save me working it out.:-)
7) Possible aids to basic math model :-7a) Quantum cells = +,- sqrt(hbar*c)
in cgs units; +,- sqrt(4pi*eps0*hbar*c) for the
SI :-7b attenuation of 1/d^2 + state boundry at (G ????)

Appendix:- I have forgotten some of the needed edits so you will have to
remind by being irritating again please bring up points with my replies
thanks.

 :-) Paulps. when we get to v1E0 we should be cooking with gas

Credits to :-
Sue,

Neutral to allocated

Debits to:-
Bilge, Dirk, Bill

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Improved facts
    ... >> a result of relative motion between the source and the observer. ... >> of vacuum and as such is used as a constant. ... >> c) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source with respect ... If a volume of gas has only three particles, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • New improved fact v0132
    ... character would be displayed.The view that EMR is a wave in a vacuum is both ... No facts have yet been presented that successfully dispute this view and the ... velocity's within a given medium this does not mean that if the medium ... changes the velocity will not change. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: new improved facts v011
    ... > that the light is constant in by a spectrophotometer and computation, ... I presume when the asterisks around the word vacuum ... > Simplified procedure to determine simplified observer velocity relative to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • new improved facts v011
    ... if not vacuum? ... e) The SOL is *independent* of the velocity of the source. ... that the light is constant in by a spectrophotometer and computation, ... Simplified procedure to determine simplified observer velocity relative to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: new improved facts v01
    ... > b) The vacuum will support a charge. ... > e) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source. ... > respect to the vacuum that the light is constant in by a spectrophotometer ... > Simplified procedure to determine simplified observer velocity relative to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast