Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge
From: FrediFizzx (fredifizzx_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: Paulps: "Re: new improved facts v012"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Point"
- In reply to: John C. Polasek: "Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:29:57 -0800
"John C. Polasek" <jpolasek@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:sr3u21h4uqpcedjoobc4dm3bmc2bj94q02@4ax.com...
| On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:31:23 -0800, "FrediFizzx"
| <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote:
|
| >"John C. Polasek" <jpolasek@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
| >news:uder21d33klk9g6ias1rihha4e7gkbe5i2@4ax.com...
| >| On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 07:56:39 GMT,
dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net
| >| (Bilge) wrote:
| >|
| >| > John C. Polasek:
| >| > >On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:24:37 GMT,
| >dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net
| >| > >(Bilge) wrote:
| >| > >
| >| > >> John C. Polasek:
| >| > >> >On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 22:48:27 GMT,
| >dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net
| >| > >>
| >| > >> >> No, I don't have to retract anything. ``Dunce'' refers to
| >| > >> >>your inability to figure out that the units for Z are
contrived
| >| > >> >>units for 1/velocity.
| >| > >> >
| >| > >> >You truly are a fool.
| >| > >> >In real life, real ohms convert real amperes into real volts.
| >Refer to
| >| > >
| >| > >We're talking about electricity, ELECTRICITY, that's what
| >| >
| >| > No, we're talking about electromagnetic theory in usenet physics
| >| >newsgroup and you keep referring to the engineering conventions
| >defined
| >| >by committe as justification for your quirky ideas about physics.
| >| >So, either figure out that units defined by a standards body for
the
| >| >sake of uniformity have no relationship to fundamental physics, or
| >| >go take your argument to alt.asme.si.ieee.droid.regurgitate.
| >| >
| >| > Once again, you included no equations.
| >| >
| >| All the equations you need are in my paper "Permittivity" at
| >| http://www.dualspace.net. Why would I bother to write equations
here
| >| in ASCII type?
| >
| >He means to just put your paper in html on a web page -- the
equations
| >will become images. I can tell you that some people will not bother
to
| >download PDF's. Or do what I do, also make a postscript .ps file and
| >add that as an alternative link. Easy to do. I get quite a bit of
| >people downloading my .ps files.
|
| The papers are in Word as well as .pdf and has figures that I don't
| believe will go html. I tried it once and they were quite unreadable.
| How can I read/write .ps files. I've never been able to read a .ps?
| How could I put it in .ps if I can't open .ps? Help.
You can output your Word doc as html plus images. The equations will go
to an "image" folder as a series of images. To output a postscript
file, just setup a dummy print driver for a postscript printer like the
Apple color ones (if you need help with this, send me an email with what
OS you are using). Then when you print your document to it, just select
"Print to File" instead of print to paper. I don't know if you are
using Windows or Mac but Win will want to put a .prn extension on the
file name. Just change it to .ps. You can download and install the
free Ghostscript stuff for opening postscript files and checking them.
Do a google search for it.
| >| The whole paper proves that permittivity is real, eps0 is not a
| >| figment but is shown equal to e_e*rho/K among others, and reveals a
| >| fundamental constant lambda that is the cell size containing
electron
| >| positron pairs (that gives rho), all deduced from Maxwell's
| >| divergence equation and Anderson's pair production experiment. It's
| >| the ep+ pairs that legitimize permittivity.
|
| No, not cast iron proof, but facts plus a couple of inspirations that
| mark a new theory thats lead to highly convincing consequences.
|
| As for example that creation occurs when the electrons are freed up
| from their positrons and expand linearly by 1/alpha, in the process
| expanding a density of 2e10kg/m3 by 2.5 million (1/alf^3) to exactly
| the sp.gr. of iron, the expansion energy being exactly sufficient to
| propel the electrons to the speed of light, meantime leaving in Espace
| an image of our universe as positrons, being the Dual Space concept
| that makes it possible to transfer the vacuum gravity problem to the
| solid of Espace where the Navier Stokes equation defines the pressure
| gradient that is gravity. The two spaces are scaled by alpha, my
| lambda being 2alpha *CWL. That is the profound meaning of alpha, the
| scale factor between our space and Espace, which has been debated for
| years. They can expand the gyromagnetic ratio in alpha all they want,
| it's all hollow numerics.
Yes, I am sure that alpha is a geometric constant.
| In light of that, it appears absurd to debate endlessly with Bilge
| about what he will or will not allow on his newsgroup, which
| highlights his feeble feel for physics. He should be a hall monitor.
It's kind of like debating with you about unit systems. ;-)
FrediFizzx
- Next message: Paulps: "Re: new improved facts v012"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Point"
- In reply to: John C. Polasek: "Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Coulomb's constant is a CGS kludge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
