Re: new improved facts v012

From: Paulps (paulpsremove_at_freeuk.com)
Date: 03/10/05 

Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:45:03 -0000

"PD" <pdraper@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1110476050.056388.120720@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Paul,
>
> This is not the way to develop a theory.
>

I am truly sorry PD for upsetting you and other posters and if I could think
a simpler and more productive method of how to learn the necessary parts of
physics that I need and have forgotten or never learned I would do so. I
have in fact tried less lethal methods but they failed for one reason or
another, my irritation perhaps being the main one :-( . Even on this run I
was treated as an idiot which was somewhat less than polite and attempts to
twist my tail are fairly frequent even now so I have been forced into
teaching these twisters that I can bite :-() if I have to. If they feel
that anoyed then they will
just have to complain about my supposed abuse and reap the rewards, as from
my Pov I am trying to do some research and the twisters are obstructing it.
I am at the moment filing all the responses from all my responders so I can
both profile them and evaluate thier responses more fully and thanks again.
You may have your way of dealing with your questions but I have mine and to
try and impose your methods on me I find both insulting and juvenile. I
respect your knowledge base and will access it at my convenience if you
allow me to but I will not be told how to read a book and when, I hope you
understand my point.
I will not go into my personal circumstances any further than I have in
other threads but they have some bearing on my posts and methods.

> What you're trying to do is start with dictionary definitions, and then
> incorporate responder comments until

Perhaps intelligent reading of my posts would have abbreviated much of the
unnecessary traffic on this group.
I have now had my tea and a couple of glases of red wine so the rest of this
reply will be less tight and maybe degenerate into LOL abuse but I hope I
wont have to resort to this well alright I dont care the wines worked. :-)

> a) people stop complaining
> and/or
> b) you've replicated everything that is presently understood,
> in the hopes that at the end of that, you'll have something new AND
> acceptable.
>

Spot on no point in producing something that ain't exeptable its waste of
time don't you think ?

> There are several things wrong with this:
> 1. You'll never know when you've crossed the line from (a) to (b), and
> you'll never know whether (a) occurs because people are tired of
> correcting you or because you've got it right.

You may now know but I hope I will

> 2. This is a terribly inefficient way to learn a subject.

That is your opinion.

> It's sort of
> like playing that game where you guess a word with four letters and
> your playmate tells you how many letters in your guess are correct and
> how many are incorrect. It would be *much* more efficient to study
> prepared, quality-reviewed material on different subjects.

No problem with you aproch is how do you know that the quality revue
materisl is not driven by the bookselers profits.
For example I puchased a book for £8.99 recently by a popular prof . from a
major university that perported to explain string theory, just to catch up
on the state of play dont yu know, as I sometimes do every few year waiting
for the physics establishment to sort it all out and get their act together.
I had abandond physics some 40 years ago as being so of plot that it would
need a major resort to get it back on track (just my opinion of course) and
I had more amusing things to do at the time anyway. So I read chap. 1 of
this book where this prof. guy rattled on about relativity lol, chap 2 lol
and to quote some other poter about me (in my opinion) quote "optic nerve
from anus" ROFL still tickels me must be demeted:-) thats me not the prof.
as he new the answers or his publisher had told him he did another was money
in it lol. So to put it politly we keep pear revues in the toilet.

> 3. It's a terrible waste of bandwidth on this forum, to the point where
> you are inviting abuse complaints.

Dont you threaten you me you pompos pratt. lol. Get on with it then as if
they start to look at my records of your and others posts you may have
change your isp and anonimus if you havnt already. That the wine talkeing
lol.

> 4. You will NOT succeed on breaching the new in this way, primarily
> because it is so incremental. If your throwing arm is weak, you'll
> never be able to clear the fence with the ball, and the ball will
> always come to rest in the grass.
>

You don't know how long my throwing arm is as I've had it in my pocket up to
now so when my fist comes through the screen and smack you in the chops you
may then begin to be able to comment on its length ROFL. Sorry about that
last but its the wine. You can just stop playing with my balls as well:-)
I would like to add more quietly from the floor that....... I've
forgotten......... maybe thats it.......... I have short term memory lose
and long term as well to.:-) Ah! I have remembered............... no
forgotten it again Ah! remembered I am working anonymously so as I do not
wish for any credit and I am hoping that somebody will take up the torch of
sorting physics out and run with it as I am really to old and my keyboards
knakerd and I must get a new one because its taking me more time to sort out
the typos than it is to write this stuff and I also seem to have become more
dislexic. I have just notice I cant clearly see what I have written so with
me mistyping it and you misreading its no winder that you have been
misunderstanding me except for the bit about the length of my arm..........
I dont half drivel on, must stop.

You may now reply:-) and I hope I have not damaged your HD as I may need to
access it again. Please tell you friends you may include it in the faq my
work has no copyrigh and is free to all interested partiest:-). lets have a
party!!!!!!!!!!!
Paulps.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: new improved facts v012
    ... > physics that I need and have forgotten or never learned I would do so. ... > I am at the moment filing all the responses from all my responders so I ... > reply will be less tight and maybe degenerate into LOL abuse but I hope I ... > Dont you threaten you me you pompos pratt. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Update, i guess.. and some questions about blood pressure.
    ... hell, lol). ... i think i was developing some symptoms.. ... was very aware of my pulse. ... i dont know. ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: OT:Advice to Steven Scoopex Jones
    ... I will let you into a secret, you live a usenet life, we all live a real life.To you getting out and doing something socially is a major event and you feel the need to let the whole of usenet know.To us its normal and not worth mentioning. ... If you intend on being like this for much longer, dont you think you need to start asking yourself if its a waste of life? ... why wouldnt you bookmark it for Texlor too? ... lol. ...
    (uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool)