Re: new improved facts v013

From: Tom Roberts (tjroberts_at_lucent.com)
Date: 03/12/05 

Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 02:13:12 GMT

Paulps wrote:
> [... word salad omitted]

You still have given no clue about this:
> You keep _ASSUMING_ (and asserting) that "velocity with respect to vacuum" has meaning. It does not until and unless you can display some method of _measuring_ it. That means you must either:
> a) describe how to measure the speed of this apparatus (any apparatus)
> "relative to vacuum"
> or:
> b) describe how to measure the "speed of vacuum" relative to some
> apparatus (any apparatus of your choosing).

Please describe how to do one of these, or admit you do not know how to
measure "speed relative to vacuum".

Tom Roberts tjroberts@lucent.com

Relevant Pages

  • Re: new improved facts v013 annoyed
    ... Tom Roberts snipped and sniped and wrote: ... Paulps then wrote: ... vacuum" has meaning. ... |> a) describe how to measure the speed of this apparatus ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
    ... A perfect vacuum cannot be regarded as a 'frame'. ... electrodes and fields used by the apparatus DO define a rest frame. ... Do you refute this, Henri? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: new improved facts v013
    ... all an apparatus can determine from "deviation frequency (spectral ... shift)" is its speed relative to the _SOURCE_ (I am ignoring gravitation ... vacuum" has meaning. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast