Re: new improved facts v011

From: paulps (paulpsremove_at_freeuk.com)
Date: 03/15/05 

Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:50:54 -0000

"jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:39mdl5F62lka9U1@individual.net...
|
| "Paulps" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:1110830019.11561.0@echo.uk.clara.net...
| >
| [snip]
| > Good for them and I hope they get a good dose as it opens the pores of
the
| > mind.
| Most of them are dearly departed. That's why everyone gets
| away with putting word's in there mouths.

Yes I suspected that but their difficult to interrogate so I'm stuck with
the acolytes if I have a question and a concern.
Any good acolytes you know ?

| > Would you like to comment on this clip from one of your old posts? haunt
| > haunt
| > +
| > What does Planck have to do with it ?
| Probably some comment about EM propagation.
| > X and gamma rays show no respect for Planck.
| > But they do respect 1/r^2 .
| They don't depend on atomic oscillators for emission.
| Eh?
| > One of the best radiation shields you can buy
| > is distance. Cheap too ;-)
| << the radiation dose a person receives depends on how
| close the person is to the source. The greater the distance
| between the person and the source of radiation, the smaller
| the dose. In fact, the dose decreases with the square of the
| distance. A person ten feet from the radiation source receives
| only one one-hundredth as much radiation as a person one
| foot from the source.
| >>
| http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~rer/rerhtml/rer_26.html
| > +
| > You seem to be writing that hbar is not applicable to X and Gamma ray
but
| > that doesn't jibe with my texts or understanding of establishment
thinking.
|
| Establishment thinking? You mean like "CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas" or
| "drilling in Alaska will cure a gasoholic nation" and
| that sort of thing? Yeah... ya don't wanna go up against those types. ;-)
|
But a Estab. Profs just cost me £8.99 for a PB so I'm going to get me moneys
worth in lol for starters with maybe a conversion or two to thinking.Tell me
I'm a fool and would be better of and safer in my coffin but a mans gota do
what a mans gota do while he is still alive. Its a man thing, tet. woman
dont get it so bad unless they take the tablets :-)

| X and gamma rays can be born, do something useful and die without
| ever getting near an atomic oscillator.

What can they do thats usefull without moding an atomic oscillator unless
you mean going from place to place.?

| "Light is emitted or absorbed by an *atom* in discrete amounts called
quanta."
| --Max Planck

100% agree with that but they then seemed to build QM on the fact its
difficult to nail a thing down and measure its velocity at the same time
seemed mentaly deranged to me and I should know :-)?. And then they double
slit yu and claim mystery time travel recent stuff.

| Methinks you are confusing the statisical formalism of Quantum Mechanics
| for a qualitative theory.

 Of course, kick myself in head, I must be getting even more brain damaged
posting to this group:-)

But hang on I have a PB by an establishment prof 2000 who at least implies
that if you took Planck away from QM that it would fall ? Did it fall to
those in the know and I didnt notice? if it has then that will free up up a
few gigs :-)

| Tip: If ya wanna stay off the wave/particle merry-go-round, learn all
| the different ways to determine and specify "free space permeability"
|
I want to be able to describe the construction of a partical as a minimum
target.
Working.....................freeSP.................out of data and decoding
error :-)
Have a look up front lol but post here perhaps we wont get noticed:-)
Are you wet yet, my wife will kill me if you are :-) I'll tel her as I'm
only sneaky for fun, kick me in the cruch if you think thats best :-)
Paulps

Relevant Pages