Re: New improved facts v0131
From: paulps (paulpsremove_at_freeuk.com)
Date: 03/16/05
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Previous message: Mark Martin: "Re: If The Universe Started without Gravity - It Had Edges"
- In reply to: Bill Hobba: "Re: New improved facts v0131"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: New improved facts v0131"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: New improved facts v0131"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:52:32 -0000
"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
news:awNZd.111$C7.17@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
|
| "paulps" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message
| news:1110913868.60214.1@dyke.uk.clara.net...
| > Please read the end before the begining as it may make more sense to
you.
| >
| > The theme of this thread is to determine if the fact of spectral shift
| > requires a state change in the vacuum in the vicinity of the source and
| > observer. The speculated state change should start to occur at the
| > atmospheric boundry or in the case of space bound equipment at the
| equipment
| > boundry of both the source and observer.
| > It is in no way meant to suggests that the SOL is not constant in vacuum
| or
| > at a local level prior to and following this state change.
| > This fact and speculation is 99% proven and this is nearly the last call
| for
| > any objections but not of the type (I am ignoring gravitation and
| cosmology
| > here, and consider only the Minkowski spacetime of SR).
| > Its effect and consequences to theories is not dealt with in detail in
| this
| > thread.
| > Please spot any deliberate mistakes.:-)
| > My English punctuation has always been appalling so please insert
| > your own comas,stops and spaces. Thanks:-)
| > For the math enthusiast see 7)
| >
| > *See Appendix at the end of this post if you have any difficulty in
| > understanding the context and meaning of words used in this text.*
| >
| > Preferred common dictionary definition used in this text.
| > Vacuum:- Absence of normal or previous content.
| > (note:- see appendix for further expansion.)
| >
| > Some simple simplified provable facts.
| >
| > a) The speed of light (SOL) is constant in vacuum and is used as a
| constant.
|
| Experimentally shown to be correct to a high degree of accuracy. (1)
|
What are you pointing to by (1)
| > b) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source.
|
| (1)
|
As above.
| > c) The fact of spectral shift as a product of Doppler shift is proof of
| > velocity differences in the vacuum in the observation process so as to
| > preserve the constancy of c and energy. To do this a state change is
| requred
| > at the source and observer boundry with the vacuum.
|
| Wrong - reasoning invalid - back to the drawing board.
You just going wrong is no reason at all if you have a reason why this is
wrong you better detail it and clearly so everybody will undertand you dont
understand.
Paulps
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Previous message: Mark Martin: "Re: If The Universe Started without Gravity - It Had Edges"
- In reply to: Bill Hobba: "Re: New improved facts v0131"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: New improved facts v0131"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: New improved facts v0131"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
