Re: Just asuming

From: jahn (susysewnshow_at_yahoo.com.au)
Date: 03/20/05 

Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:48:12 -0500

"Dr ***" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message news:1111346645.38023.2@demeter.uk.clara.net...
>
> "jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:3a3m2tF682qjuU1@individual.net...
> |
> | "PSVacuum" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message
> news:1111268224.13626.0@damia.uk.clara.net...
> | >
> | > "jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> | > news:3a30d5F64l21tU1@individual.net...
> | > |
> | > | "PSVacuum" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message
> | > news:1111243755.85618.0@demeter.uk.clara.net...
> | > | >
> | > | > "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> | > | > news:1111226953.750228.172250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> http://dept.physics.upenn.edu/courses/gladney/phys151/lectures/lecture_apr_0
> | http://departments.weber.edu/physics/schroeder/mrr/MRRtalk.html
> | http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Purcell.html
> | http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ElectricSusceptibility.html
> |
> | >
> | > | >
> | > | > Yea Ive had a look fraid I cant agree with this bit 'these wave
> | > equations do
> | > | > not need a medium to propagate' as there is no evidence that this is
> | > true
> | > | > because as far as I can see it just a maths statement that I don't
> | > dispute
> | > | > the workings of but must be applied to something and as the vacuum
> is
> | > |
> | > | That's 'cause you have never seen a pair of love-struck porcupines
> fall in
> | > | the stream.
>
> But they are balistic. That was not a relevent reply although a bit amusing.

So ya don't like the way Purcell's porcupines are illustrated.

>
> | > When I remove the vacuum as a control on the SOL in my model the SOL
> goes
> | > balistic and infinate the Maxwell works by using the c as a constant and
> | > control with no explanation of why the SOL = c
> |
> | Try using charges and inhomogenous permeability.
> | Sigh... nothing to invent tho. :-)
>
> But in the case of charges if you removes the vacuum/space between the
> charge carriers there would be no space betwen them for the field lines to
> opperate in.

What charges carriers?
Experiment 1
Shine a laser pointer across the the beam of an automobile head lamp.
Record all details of the fray that ensues as the two beams fight over
who has rights to the space where the beams intersect.

Experiment 2
Have a friend shine a torch skyward on a foggy night.
Climb up the shaft of light and measure the distance to the ground
where you hands start to win over the beam in your struggle to
occupy the space.

>
> | > | > something that is what it applies to. The point I'm trying to make
> is
> | > that
> | > | > if you applied it to a true nothing it would not work so the reason
> | > Maxwell
> | > | > works is because it works in a vacuum which is in fact something.
> | > |
> | > | Can you prove Maxwell works in both the near and far field ?
> | >
> | > I don't expect he do but he is good enough for now as I'm to old to
> rehack
> | > Maxwell against the flow, but I might grow younger if I have to, I say
> | > somewhat optimistically. I'm down to 11 now and if I go back any further
> | > I'll fall of my pearch backwards but I can carry my model onto some of
> EM
> | > effects and it seems to work but it does need a vacuum as a control.
> Lots
> | > of work to code it up so it can be used outside my head.
> |
> | "code it up" ???
>
> Write a simulation
>
> | Charges know the speed of light. You don't have to write code for
> | them.
> |
>
> How do they know
>
> | http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/FineStructureConstant.html
> | http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/alpha.html
> |
> | >
> | > |
> | > | For
> | > | > example this math would not work in non existance i.e. a complete
> | > absence
> | > | > of anything, no restriction on the SOL, nothing. You have to have
> some
> | > sort
> | > | > of ground for anything, no ground no anything clue up somebody
> please.
> | > To me
> | > |
> | > | I see... ground is made of ground.
> | > |
> | > Your just to sexy for your shirt :-) ground is made of a vacuum offset
>
> | > | Ya don't see many brick houses in Florida. Ever wonder why ?
> | > |
> | > Never been to Florida earthquakes? They have thrown them all at people
> like
> | > me ?
> |
> | Hmmm... not a bad idea. >:)
> |
> | A Concrete Experience... Concrete is also economical in Florida.
> | The entire peninsula, once a seabed, is made out of limestone
> | and sand, the chief ingredients of concrete. ...
>
> Are you thretening me with a concret overcoat? what was all that about?
>
> | http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/klassen8.html
> |
>

You are trying to build a brick house where you are surrounded by
ready made ingredrients.

That's OK... when limestone gobbles up a brick house they call
it a sink hole.

1/r^2 1/r^3

Sue...

>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Just asuming
    ... No fraid not no vacuum that I can see, ... |> But in the case of charges if you removes the vacuum/space between the ... | Shine a laser pointer across the the beam of an automobile head lamp. ... when limestone gobbles up a brick house they call ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How can I email contact info, like in a vCard?
    ... option to Beam. ... need to do the actual vCard, I was using that as an example. ... to drum up MMS charges!) ...
    (microsoft.public.pocketpc.phone_edition)
  • Re: How can I email contact info, like in a vCard?
    ... need to do the actual vCard, I was using that as an example. ... know what features are part of the OS, a "value add" by the device manufacturer, the carrier, or even by third-party software! ... The Beam by Message option on my device could've easily been added by HTC (or even AT&T to drum up MMS charges!) ...
    (microsoft.public.pocketpc.phone_edition)
Quantcast