Re: Just asuming
From: Dr *** (paulpsremove_at_freeuk.com)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: Michael Levin: "Re: A question about cosmic microwave radiation and special relativity"
- Previous message: Michael Levin: "Re: A question about cosmic microwave radiation and special relativity"
- In reply to: jahn: "Re: Just asuming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:35:49 -0000
"jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:3a62i0F684tjaU1@individual.net...
|
| "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:1111346645.38023.2@demeter.uk.clara.net...
| >
| > "jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
| > news:3a3m2tF682qjuU1@individual.net...
| > |
| > | "PSVacuum" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message
| > news:1111268224.13626.0@damia.uk.clara.net...
| > | >
| > | > "jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
| > | > news:3a30d5F64l21tU1@individual.net...
| > | > |
| > | > | "PSVacuum" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:1111243755.85618.0@demeter.uk.clara.net...
| > | > | >
| > | > | > "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
| > | > | > news:1111226953.750228.172250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
| >
http://dept.physics.upenn.edu/courses/gladney/phys151/lectures/lecture_apr_0
| > | http://departments.weber.edu/physics/schroeder/mrr/MRRtalk.html
| > | http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Purcell.html
| > | http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ElectricSusceptibility.html
snip
| So ya don't like the way Purcell's porcupines are illustrated.
No fraid not no vacuum that I can see, if there is show me.
| >
| > | > When I remove the vacuum as a control on the SOL in my model the SOL
| > goes
| > | > balistic and infinate the Maxwell works by using the c as a constant
and
| > | > control with no explanation of why the SOL = c
| > |
| > | Try using charges and inhomogenous permeability.
| > | Sigh... nothing to invent tho. :-)
| >
| > But in the case of charges if you removes the vacuum/space between the
| > charge carriers there would be no space betwen them for the field lines
to
| > opperate in.
|
| What charges carriers?
Changes come from someware else or do you mean back to the conception of
every thing, long story?
| Experiment 1
| Shine a laser pointer across the the beam of an automobile head lamp.
| Record all details of the fray that ensues as the two beams fight over
| who has rights to the space where the beams intersect.
Never tried it, are you saying you think they wont intermodulate? in my
model if you juggle the intensitys you can disrupt
the laser what do you think happens?
| Experiment 2
| Have a friend shine a torch skyward on a foggy night.
| Climb up the shaft of light and measure the distance to the ground
| where you hands start to win over the beam in your struggle to
| occupy the space.
|
The presence of particals to that degree of complexity would make the probem
unmanagable. Try light miles from source and a partical what do you think
happens?
| >
| > | > | > something that is what it applies to. The point I'm trying to
make
| > is
| > | > that
| > | > | > if you applied it to a true nothing it would not work so the
reason
| > | > Maxwell
| > | > | > works is because it works in a vacuum which is in fact
something.
| > | > |
| > | > | Can you prove Maxwell works in both the near and far field ?
| > | >
| > | > I don't expect he do but he is good enough for now as I'm to old to
| > rehack
| > | > Maxwell against the flow, but I might grow younger if I have to, I
say
| > | > somewhat optimistically. I'm down to 11 now and if I go back any
further
| > | > I'll fall of my pearch backwards but I can carry my model onto some
of
| > EM
| > | > effects and it seems to work but it does need a vacuum as a
control.
| > Lots
| > | > of work to code it up so it can be used outside my head.
| > |
| > | "code it up" ???
| >
| > Write a simulation
| >
| > | Charges know the speed of light. You don't have to write code for
| > | them.
| > |
| >
| > How do they know
| >
| > | http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/FineStructureConstant.html
| > | http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/alpha.html
| > |
Didn't explain it to me, thick I expect? how do it
|
| You are trying to build a brick house where you are surrounded by
| ready made ingredrients.
No vacuum in um, fall to bits soon
|
| That's OK... when limestone gobbles up a brick house they call
| it a sink hole.
See which then?
|
| 1/r^2 1/r^3
Out of data error
Dr ***
- Next message: Michael Levin: "Re: A question about cosmic microwave radiation and special relativity"
- Previous message: Michael Levin: "Re: A question about cosmic microwave radiation and special relativity"
- In reply to: jahn: "Re: Just asuming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
