Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds
jillarontown_at_webtv.net
Date: 03/25/05
- Next message: jillarontown_at_webtv.net: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- Previous message: Tim: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- In reply to: Tim: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:19:23 -0600
(George Hammond) wrote:
> [Hammond]
> Dear Philosophy newsgroup
> readers..... can't I get some kind
> of an INTELLIGENT-SERIOUS
> comment from someone.....
> the nerds on the physics newsgroups
> are driving me crazy with nonsense
> about this.
> George Hammond, physicist
=================================
ELEMENTARY SCIENTIFIC
PROOF OF GOD
<snip citations about mental speed and IQ> [Hammond] OK, ... let me give
you a simple heuristic picture that explains what GOD is, in TWO STEPS:
STEP ONE:
Take "picture fusion frequency"... you know, the phenomena
that makes moving picture films possible. It is a
proven scientific fact that a 7 year old can only discriminate 10
frames/sec as being individual images.. above that he sees a continuous
image (a 'movie'). However, a 15 year old can discriminate 15 frames/sec
before it turns into a moving picture. It has been proven that this is
due to the increasing intelligence (mental speed) of the growing
children's brains! What this means is that if we
define what the adult sees as "reality".... then ergo: 1/3 of said
reality is INVISIBLE to the 7 year old! The 7 year old is surrounded by
an INVISIBLE WORLD which only the adults (or more fully grown people)
can see! STEP TWO:
OK.... it is ALSO a proven fact that no one in the
human race ever achieves "full growth". This fact is proven by the
existence of the well known 'Secular Trend' in human growth. See this
simple "explains it all" picture:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1_files/img0.gif
OK... said Secular Trend shows that the average human stops growing when
he is about, say, 15% shy of full growth.
Then, by the reasoning of STEP ONE, this means that
"15% of true reality is INVISIBLE" to the average full grown adult. And
in fact it varies from person to person, some people are missing 20%,
some 10% .
Isn't it obvious that this simple phenomena of "an
invisible reality based on adult growth differences" is the SCIENTIFIC
EXPLANATION OF THE
HISTORICALY KNOWN PHENOMENA OF GOD?
What
the heck's wrong with you?
That's such a simple,
proven,
scientific explanation
of "God"
that a high school drop
out
could understand it!!
==================================
[jillaront]
1] I have been thinking about the above text and how it might relate to
some philosophical ideas. It should indicate an interest in
philosophical circles because of its historical roots.
2] I started comparing the above to what Plato's analogy of the cave or
Hegel's phenomenology of Spirit gives as the ground work. They make a
similar case with different terminology. What is missing in the above
text is the WORDING of the 'dialectical'.
a] One philosophical question then is, can science even be dialectical,
or is there a purist claim in science that it must omit such discourse
in order to be science?
b] ...."it varies from person to person, some people are missing 20%,
some 10%"...
If we use Plato's or Hegel's thinking or even a modern day dialectics
there must be some type of dialecticism occurring between the 20% and
the 10% groups.
I would be interested in how a criteria is established in science where
a community has some scientists with 20% secular trend deficit, or some
with only10%?
What is the neutral ground for discoursing the opposition of ideas for
each group and to argue the truth about the identity of the invisible
part? What grants the common terms that allows the discourse over the
differences between the two groups?
3] The naming of all known and deficit parts for a wholistic identity is
termed 'total agency' by critical realism. The use of the term 'God' is
authoritative and therefore deontic to common logical scrutiny. "Total
agency" is a more neutral term. Older philosophical terms have been:
'virtue' [the virtual good], the 'shinning', the 'divine', the 'spirit'.
Again we should note these as historical but not neutral because of how
their meanings are practiced in cultures.
jillaront
- Next message: jillarontown_at_webtv.net: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- Previous message: Tim: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- In reply to: Tim: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
