Re: New impoved facts part 1v02

From: Dr *** (paulpsremove_at_freeuk.com)
Date: 03/26/05 

Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:48:15 -0000

"jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:3ajlkfF6cc68sU1@individual.net...
|
| "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:1111788924.83968.1@demeter.uk.clara.net...
| >
| > "jahn" <susysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
| > news:3aj8ipF6904gfU1@individual.net...
| > |
| > | "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@freeuk.com> wrote in message
| > news:1111777565.78028.0@demeter.uk.clara.net...
| > | > The theme of this thread is to determine and document a
| > | > non paradoxical factual base for Special Relativity (SR).
<snip>
| > | Simply put the imaginary time axis in Maxwell's equations where it
belongs
| > | then real time will work on the railroad tracks and the 2 postulates
will
| > | reconcile without funny clocks and twins will age normally.
| >
| > Dont agree:-) which imaginary time axis?
|
| In Maxwell it is advanced and retarded potential.

Hang on advanced and retarded potential are real.

| In SR it is the clock with a FTL path.

There was no FTL path in my description and as far ase I know there was no
FTL path in SR your imagining it :-)

| The clock "goes" because of how it "appears".

That may be SR but its not mine mine realy goes and and comes back, here it
is again with the section highlighted

We start with Bill and Paul at rest relative to each other in the centre of
a sphere of stars 20 light years away who's average velocity relative to
Bill and Paul is zero. Both Bill and Paul have monochromatic light sources
of which the other has the frequency of and is able to detect any variation
of.
They know they are stationary relative to the surrounding star field by
evaluating the hydrogen spectral line shift from the surrounding stars. They
do some tests and discover that they can determine their velocity with
respect to each other and the surrounding star field by measuring the
frequency shift of the surrounding star field and each others monochromatic
light source. **Now they also have watches that they can compare and they
find
that if one of them travels away and returns from the other at a c/2 for
example then on his return he finds his watch reads an earlier time to the
other who remained relatively stationary but if they both move away and
return then their watches agree.** Weird ain't it as it appears moving
slows
you down and you age more slowly. So get off the sofa and run about
otherwise you will be dead earlier :-)

| > |
| > | Sheesh! Your are moving the city inside the jail cell rather that
| > releasing
| > | the prisoner.
| > |
| >
| > I've released the prisinors but they went so fast you never saw them go
:-)
| > read the rest.
| Here here! and rest the read!

Brain damage :-)?

Ardvark

| Sue...
|
|
| >
| > | Sue...
| > |
| > | well we know that as you move faster the shorter you get if
| > | > you are going head or feet first and this means that the atoms that
| > make up
| > | > your body will be distorted into an ellipsoid shape. Now atoms that
have
| > | > distorted into an ellipsoid will work/oscillate more slowly than
atoms
| > in a
| > | > more relaxed spheroid shape. I think this will be shown by the
hydrogen
| > line
| > | > being shifted when generated by an atom or particle under single
axis
| > stress
| > | > and other measurements.
| > | > Perhaps to be continued.
| > | >
| > | >
| >
| > Ardvark
| >
| >
|
|

Quantcast