Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?
From: Henri Wilson (H_at_..(Henri)
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Thanks"
- Previous message: Dr ***: "Re: New impoved facts part 1v02"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:33:43 GMT
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:48:48 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote:
>Henri Wilson wrote:
>
>> Sometimes I feel like a complete failure.
>> The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong.
>
>
> There has NEVER been a prediction of SR or GTR that was contradicted
> by an observation. NEVER!
If any prediction of SR is correct (which I doubt) it is because the equations
of LET apply in 'local aether frames'.
Einstein's version of aether theory is plain nonsense.
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
Sometimes I feel like a complete failure.
The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong.
- Next message: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Thanks"
- Previous message: Dr ***: "Re: New impoved facts part 1v02"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|