Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Einstein's BooBoo Tutorial One"
- In reply to: kenseto: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:44:24 GMT
kenseto wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
> Until there is credible evidence that they are wrong, they remain
> the tools of choice in their domains. To find something wrong and
> understanding the reason will be very exciting!
>
>
> That's because mainstream physicists refuse to do experiments that could
> potentially contradict SR.
That not true--there have been tens of thousands of experiment that could
have knocked of SR, but didn't!
Crank Seto forgets that the has *never* been a prediction of SR that was
contradicted by and observation. And that SR and GTR are continually
used by the global positioning system (GPS) 24/7.
We thank Seto for registering at crank dot net.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ken+H.+Seto%22+site%3Awww.crank.net
- Next message: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Einstein's BooBoo Tutorial One"
- In reply to: kenseto: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]