Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (net_at_nospam.com)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: Steve Schaffner: "Re: We are Apes"
- Previous message: yõwïe: "Re: We are Apes"
- In reply to: scm: "Why Relativity must be wrong..."
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Why Relativity must be wrong..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:20:49 -0700
Dear scm:
"scm" <stephcmartin@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1112147942.613072.47330@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Axiom: Time is a succession of events (a logic
> device created by man)
> Axiom: Events are absolute
> I can't believe that time is not absolute.
Jane attributes 6 years of my time to the rise and fall of the
Roman Empire. Given the Earth-rest frame duration, can you
detemine how fast Jane was moving for this period?
Note that Jane still has the same sequence of emperors that Earth
observers agree on. Only the "distance" between events is
relative. Time is an illusion. Quantum mechanics does really
well without it.
David A. Smith
- Next message: Steve Schaffner: "Re: We are Apes"
- Previous message: yõwïe: "Re: We are Apes"
- In reply to: scm: "Why Relativity must be wrong..."
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Why Relativity must be wrong..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
