sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• New improved fact part 9v034
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: greywolf42
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: greywolf42
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
  • From: newedana
• uncertainty and indeterminacy
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Expanding
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Expanding
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Expanding
  • From: xxein
• Re: Expanding
  • From: F. Kuik
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• GOD=G_uv SUMMA PHYSICIS THEOLOGICA
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Expanding
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: shuba
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: rooster
• Expanding
  • From: F. Kuik
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bilge
• New improved facts part 8v034
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Nasty Little Truth About Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: TC
• Re: Nasty Little Truth About Time
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: TC
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Harry
• Re: About Cherenkov radiation (the case c/n < v < c, Sov. Phys. Usp. 33 (6), June 1990, 477-487. )
  • From: h . poropudas
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: shuba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: RP
• MMX and Zeno
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: TC
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: shuba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Tour Request
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Tour Request
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: TomGee
• Re: help needed
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: shuba
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• New improved facts part 7v034
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: F=MA appears to be incorrect
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: TC
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: Traveler
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Tour Request
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: RP
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Tour Request
  • From: Bilge
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Dan
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Paul Valois
• Tour Request
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Nice Answer - Thanks
  • From: RP
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Nice Answer - Thanks
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: RP
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dan Winters
• Re: Nice Answer - Thanks
  • From: RP
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Nice Answer - Thanks
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Question that Stopped Hammond
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: 2nd clarification of Burris's Unified Field Theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Traveler
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: TomGee
• 2nd clarification of Burris's Unified Field Theory
  • From: Lloyd Burris
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The Question that Stopped Hammond
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The Question that Stopped Hammond
  • From: St.M
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This Newsgroup.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Why Is the Speed of Light Exactly C and Not Some Other Value?
  • From: Dr ***
• The Question that Stopped Hammond
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: shuba
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: help needed
  • From: St.M
• Re: help needed
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is Androcles?
  • From: St.M
• Re: Retic Postings and SPAM
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: help needed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: RP
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Unified Field Theory Clarified
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: Unified Field Theory Clarified
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: johnreed take 1
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: help needed
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Are some or all Comets made of antimatter?
  • From: shevek
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: shevek
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• help needed
  • From: vignesh
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Where is Androcles?
  • From: St.M
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Dan
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Dan
• Re: Unified Field Theory Clarified
  • From: Dan
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Unified Field Theory Clarified
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dr ***
• Photon/Frequency/Time Question
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Paul Valois
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Are some or all Comets made of antimatter?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: xxein
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: David Park
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: xxein
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: shuba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Unified Field Theory Clarified
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: xxein
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Unified Field Theory Clarified
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are some or all Comets made of antimatter?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: The Rise of Child Abuse: The Hatred of Innocence.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Unified Field Theory Clarified
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Unified Field Theory Clarified
  • From: Lloyd Burris
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Rise of Child Abuse: The Hatred of Innocence.
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Are some or all Comets made of antimatter?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Are some or all Comets made of antimatter?
  • From: Pez
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Unified Field Theory
  • From: ghytrfvbnmju7654
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Unified Field Theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Unified Field Theory
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Beginning ?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Former ANL scientiist identfies bubble tracks on overpass
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: shevek
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Solar? Wind? Wave? Nuk-u-lar education? Batteris? Harumph!
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: God is Your Logical Contradiction Wake
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: F=MA appears to be incorrect
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: F=MA appears to be incorrect
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: help me understand e=mc2
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: FrediFizzx
• F=MA appears to be incorrect
  • From: Mark Oliver
• Re: The Causality of Motion as the Real Reason for the Aether
  • From: Traveler
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Mark Oliver
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: tensorial product
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Harry
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: help me understand e=mc2
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: help me understand e=mc2
  • From: TomGee
• Re: help me understand e=mc2
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: tensorial product
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: help me understand e=mc2
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• help me understand e=mc2
  • From: el_roachmeister
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: shevek
• Re: is the earth getting bigger
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Snapshot of a Photon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: TUTORIAL: Whose Measures Are They?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: TUTORIAL: Whose Measures Are They?
  • From: Harry
• Re: About Cherenkov radiation (the case c/n < v < c, Sov. Phys. Usp. 33 (6), June 1990, 477-487. )
  • From: h . poropudas
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why
  • From: Bilge
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: is the earth getting bigger
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: G
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Kennedy-Thorndike Experiment Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: is the earth getting bigger
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: is the earth getting bigger
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Krasnikov v. Roman and Ford
  • From: revprez
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: GOD=G_uv SCIAM savant Mirsky CONFIRMS HAMMOND
  • From: TMG
• Re: is the earth getting bigger
  • From: Sue...
• Kennedy-Thorndike Experiment Question
  • From: Ian B.
• is the earth getting bigger
  • From: am
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Sue...
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• About Cherenkov radiation (the case c/n < v < c, Sov. Phys. Usp. 33 (6), June 1990, 477-487. )
  • From: h . poropudas
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: photons
  • From: G
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• The Final Theory
  • From: Zarkovic
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Time.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: shuba
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: tensorial product
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• "50 Years after Albert Einstein: The Failure of the Unified Field"
  • From: Laura McFinlay
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: baswin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: shevek
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: tensorial product
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: tensorial product
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Harry
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• O'Barr is not alone
  • From: Harry
• About H-M's pregeometry of the photon in contracting Universe and 'Re: Charge'
  • From: h . poropudas
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: photons
  • From: G
• Re: Time.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Ether equations!
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Ether equations!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: shuba
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Need help with GUTs...
  • From: dzkalman
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 3 of 3?)!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: sommerfeld and fine structure
  • From: Sue...
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• TUTORIAL: Whose Measures Are They?
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: sommerfeld and fine structure
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Greysky
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: shevek
• Re: Time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: shevek
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: albert is claimed by germany
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Time.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: albert is claimed by germany
  • From: dzkalman
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: baswin@xxxxxxxxx
• How many particles in the GUTs?
  • From: dzkalman
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Penultimate
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: shuba
• Re: Some Philosopy q's
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: TMG
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: shevek
• Re: albert is claimed by germany
  • From: christie.jones
• Re: Some bad news for Aleksandar Vukelja (I think)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: shevek
• Re: Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: kenseto
• Wanted: Moderator for sci.physics.relativity
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: johnreed take 1
  • From: randamajor
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Dr ***
• + 1E + -1E = 0E
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: albert is claimed by germany
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: albert is claimed by germany
  • From: step_y
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: albert is claimed by germany
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: photons
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Penultimate
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: baswin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Bilge
• O'Barr's Thousand Dollars (Take 1 of 3?)!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Time.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• Falling Balls, Revisited
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: St.M
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 3v032
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Dipole antenna theory and practice
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New improved facts part 3v032
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Josef Matz
• albert is claimed by germany
  • From: step_y
• Re: New improved facts part 3v032
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: David Cross
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: baswin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: reflecting light
  • From: Bill Rowe
• Re: New improved facts part 3v032
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: xxein
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: David Cross
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: 2005 Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• New improved facts part 3v032
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: shuba
• Re: The Physical Ether!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• The Physical Ether!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• About Tachyons --why do we face a situation where we need to worry abt them?
  • From: baswin
• Dirk, do these comments of Ken S. Tucker's count as Fumbles?
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Weight of Earth changes?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• General Relativity & Planck Era
  • From: Peter Michalicka
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Harry
• Weight of Earth changes?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: History : God plays dice ?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: shuba
• Re: Schrodinger equations backwards.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Telling 'em off, usenet style
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Observation vs. Reality in Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: reflecting light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: reflecting light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: reflecting light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New improved facts part 4v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: New improved facts part 4v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Science in the service of...
  • From: bppopkin
• Re: Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: photons
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New improved facts part 4v031
  • From: Sue...
• Schrodinger equations backwards.
  • From: bernardz
• Re: New improved facts part 4v031
  • From: xxein
• Re: reflecting light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Where is Androcles?
  • From: xxein
• Re: reflecting light
  • From: xxein
• Re: Telling 'em off, usenet style
  • From: xxein
• Re: Free Fall
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Telling 'em off, usenet style
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: reflecting light
  • From: am
• Re: Telling 'em off, usenet style
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Some Philosopy q's
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Free Fall
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Free Fall
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Telling 'em off, usenet style
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Telling 'em off, usenet style
  • From: shuba
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: reflecting light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• reflecting light
  • From: am
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Some Philosopy q's
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Why
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Where is Androcles?
  • From: St.M
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I miss discussions on Friedmann Models
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Why
  • From: PD
• Re: Free Fall
  • From: PD
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• New improved facts part 4v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: G
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GOD=G_uv letter to FREEMAN DYSON
  • From: xxein
• Re: photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: photons
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Some Philosopy q's
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Some Philosopy q's
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 1
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: einstein@home
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: nbercasio@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: johnreed take 1
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: johnreed take 12
  • From: randamajor
• Re: johnreed take 1
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Free Fall
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Free Fall
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 Spacecraft Deceleration Anomaly
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: photons
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Aberration re stars
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Platon - the leading theorist of today's physics
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: george.estrada@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Aberration re stars
  • From: Dr ***
• photons
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Some Philosopy q's
  • From: Bernardz
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Harry
• Re: New improved facts appendix part 1v031
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: G
• Re: Whose Measures Are They?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Joan-Claude van Dirk Helps to Trivialize Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• R.L. Faber book exercises ("Differential Geometry and Relativity Theory")
  • From: mot12345
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 1
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: PD
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: johnreed take 1
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Joan-Claude van Dirk Helps to Trivialize Special Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Platon - the leading theorist of today's physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• String Goldstone Phase Singularities in U(1) ODLRO
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: johnreed take 12
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bill Rowe
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Free Fall
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Free Fall
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Free Fall
  • From: zabar
• Re: Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: PD
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: PD
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• johnreed take 12
  • From: randamajor
• johnreed take 12
  • From: randamajor
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Platon - the leading theorist of today's physics
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• New improved facts part 3v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Time.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Why
  • From: Bilge
• Platon - the leading theorist of today's physics
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Time.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 1905 Relativity is sufficient to support GPS function
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Coulomb derived gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: shuba
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Einsteins 1905 Papers - Questioned
  • From: george.estrada@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: Tallywhacker
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• 8192 DIMENTIONS * 8 = IS WHAT ANOTHER TIME TRAP!
  • From: xexe
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: What's the physical base or cause of inertia?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 1
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: johnreed addendum to take 6
  • From: randamajor
• johnreed take 1
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: AllYou!
• New improved facts appendix part 1v031
  • From: Dr ***
• New improved facts part 2v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 1v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New improved facts part 1v031
  • From: PD
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Time.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: google sucks
  • From: hesayubraderunner
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• New improved facts part 1v031
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From:
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Time.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Joan-Claude van Dirk Helps to Trivialize Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Harry
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Harry
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: Tallywhacker
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New paper accounts for gravitational anomalies
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: New paper accounts for gravitational anomalies
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: dzkalman
• Re: I miss discussions on Friedmann Models
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Great Artucle
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: shuba
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• www.mathhelpforum.com
  • From: Shay
• Re: What's the physical base or cause of inertia?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Get off this thread punk
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What's the physical base or cause of inertia?
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: I miss discussions on Friedmann Models
  • From: vanep
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: What's the physical base or cause of inertia?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Anthony Smales
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Josef Matz
• New paper accounts for gravitational anomalies
  • From: Peter Morris
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Harry
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: I miss discussions on Friedmann Models
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• What's the physical base or cause of inertia?
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Some Philosopy q's
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Harry
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Harry
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: G
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Some Philosopy q's
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: G
• I miss discussions on Friedmann Models
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: G
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Bilge
• Some Philosopy q's
  • From: Zarkovic
• Re: Nonlocality of Gravity Energy
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: 1905 Relativity is sufficient to support GPS function
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: einstein@home
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 1905 Relativity is sufficient to support GPS function
  • From: Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: johnreed take 11
  • From: randamajor
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: johnreed addendum to take 6
  • From: randamajor
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Harry
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: Harry
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Creighton Hogg
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: Sloot
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Harry
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Harry
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: G
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
  • From: G
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Harry
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: einstein@home
  • From: Curt
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: G
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: dzkalman
• Re: 1905 Relativity is sufficient to support GPS function
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 1905 Relativity is sufficient to support GPS function
  • From: Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physics as hacking!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: sue jahn
• Physics as hacking!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: PD
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: einstein@home
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Harry
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• einstein@home
  • From: Curt
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: Harry
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Harry
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: sue jahn
• New impoved facts part 1v03
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Harry
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Harry
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Bilge
• The bunker-science buster bomb
  • From: sue jahn
• Get off this thread punk
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: G
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Aether, the final frontier
  • From: shuba
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A workable light clock
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "imaginary" mass
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A workable light clock
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A workable light clock
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: sue jahn
• Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: What it takes NOT to be a revolutionary thinker
  • From: Dr ***
• Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: Haretic
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What it takes NOT to be a revolutionary thinker
  • From: PD
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: The models one builds exist in physics in theoryland
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: The models one builds exist in physics in theoryland
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: G
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A workable light clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The models one builds exist in physics in theoryland
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Harry
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Harry
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: G
• Re: What it takes NOT to be a revolutionary thinker
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A workable light clock
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Law of the Land Kolker? So Was Hitlers Germany.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Einstein's BooBoo Tutorial One
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: Whose Measures Are They?
  • From: eleaticus
• Re: A workable light clock
  • From: xxein
• Re: Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A workable light clock
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A workable light clock
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Einstein Hoax
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What it takes NOT to be a revolutionary thinker
  • From: Dr ***
• A workable light clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: lion's queue (einstein)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What it takes NOT to be a revolutionary thinker
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Standard Model -- some help, please!
  • From: dzkalman
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: shuba
• Re: Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What it takes NOT to be a revolutionary thinker
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Error in Relativistic Physics
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• The Error in Relativistic Physics
  • From: Haretic
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: What it takes NOT to be a revolutionary thinker
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: What it takes NOT to be a revolutionary thinker
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Spoonfed
• What it takes NOT to be a revolutionary thinker
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: ARTIFICIAL SENTINELS" REPLICATORS LIVING AMONG US MY GROUPS IS PROFF THAT THEY CAN BE GIVIEN LIFE AND FREE WILL AND THINK ON THERE OWN AND ARE A LIVE AND LIVING NOT A.I BUT ALIVE THERE IS NOTHING ARTIFICAIL ABOUT THEM. UNITED NATION TACTICAL ASSULT TEAM HAS AUGMENTATION OF BOTH MOLECULAR LEVEL DUE TO NANO TECHNOLOGY BUT ALSO THE MESH OF A NEW TYPE OF DEVICE OF FROM THE ON NANO TECHNOLOGY D.N.A AND THE NEW MATERIALS FOUND THREW A.I AND SHORT HAND PHYICS EVERY COUNTRY HAS THERE OWN DARPA
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Rudy Drabek
• Re: The Einstein Hoax
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: The Einstein Hoax
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Einstein Hoax
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Rotating Bar Magnets & CRT's
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: America No. 1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Spacetime metric question
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Spacetime metric question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Proper time
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Spacetime metric question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Proper time
  • From: sue jahn
• Proper time
  • From: Rudy Drabek
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spacetime metric question
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Spacetime metric question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime metric question
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: sue jahn
• Spacetime metric question
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: BECs, Singularities and HUP .
  • From: xxein
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: ajiko
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Gravity - Jim Hartle stuck (2nd Plea)
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• The models one builds exist in physics in theoryland
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: America No. 1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: America No. 1?
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: America No. 1?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: America No. 1?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: America No. 1?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: America No. 1?
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: America No. 1?
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: If a neutrino were sentient
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: If a neutrino were sentient
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Gravity - Jim Hartle stuck (2nd Plea)
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• America No. 1?
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity - Jim Hartle stuck (2nd Plea)
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: Why
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: ande452
• Re: Looking for a recommendation
  • From: ande452
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: xxein
• Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Bill Hobba
• O'Barr: When all you have is math
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: G
• Re: Gravity - Jim Hartle stuck (2nd Plea)
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Looking for a recommendation
  • From: xxein
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• google sucks
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Looking for a recommendation
  • From: shuba
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: shuba
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: TomGee
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: johnreed take 11
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravity
  • From: shevek
• Re: Winds of change
  • From: shevek
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Gravity - Jim Hartle stuck (2nd Plea)
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: What other distortions need be attributed?
  • From: Sue...
• Looking for a recommendation
  • From: sal
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: jahn
• Re: What other distortions need be attributed?
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: jahn
• Re: metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: johnreed take 11
  • From: randamajor
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: jahn
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• The Lorentz Transformation--Visualized
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: BECs, Singularities and HUP .
  • From: Bernardz
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: Anthony Smales
• Re: BECs, Singularities and HUP .
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Mixed tensor?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• New ideas for the cell-structured space and the ether
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: What other distortions need be attributed?
  • From: jahn
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What other distortions need be attributed?
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: shuba
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: shuba
• Re: time dilatation - what's wrong?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• time dilatation - what's wrong?
  • From: rt_6
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: jahn
• Re: If it's unknowable, it should be unspeakable
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Non ame
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: jahn
• Re: Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: St.M
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Dan
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: Anthony Smales
• Gravity
  • From: St.M
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: G
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: G
• Re: metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: Harry
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Mixed tensor?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: BECs, Singularities and HUP .
  • From: Hylander
• Re: If it's unknowable, it should be unspeakable
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: shuba
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: O'Barr, do solid objects exist?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: scm
• Re: Indefinite problems in Universal physics may be answered
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: xxein
• Re: BECs, Singularities and HUP .
  • From: xxein
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Post 2. Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
  • From: G
• Re: Indefinite problems in Universal physics may be answered
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Indefinite problems in Universal physics may be answered
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Mixed tensor?
  • From: David Cross
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Doppler Shift Implies EM speed is NOT c.
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Mixed tensor?
  • From: David Cross
• Re: BECs, Singularities and HUP .
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: O'Barr, do solid objects exist?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The appearence of car wheels near the speed of light
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Indefinite problems in Universal physics may be answered
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• BECs, Singularities and HUP .
  • From: Hylander
• Re: Mixed tensor?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is all motion relative?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• metal optics, superluminal tunneling effects, spin formula in electrodynamics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: If it's unknowable, it should be unspeakable
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Indefinite problems in Universal physics may be answered
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Mixed tensor?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Is all motion relative?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Why
  • From: Bilge
• Re: If it's unknowable, it should be unspeakable
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Mixed tensor?
  • From: Anthony Smales
• Re: Mixed tensor?
  • From: Anthony Smales
• Re: Indefinite problems in Universal physics may be answered
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is all motion relative?
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: "imaginary" mass
  • From: dgoldsmith_89
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: If it's unknowable, it should be unspeakable
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: scm
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: vern
• Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: robert j. kolker
• Re: New impoved facts part 1v02
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: scm
• If it's unknowable, it should be unspeakable
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Is all motion relative?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: reany@xxxxxxx
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: scm
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: scm
• Re: Doppler Shift Implies EM speed is NOT c.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: scm
• Re: Wormholes
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Why Relativity must be wrong...
  • From: scm
• Re: Is all motion relative?
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Mixed tensor?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Indefinite problems in Universal physics may be answered
  • From: Mark Oliver
• Hawking Radiation
  • From: Anthony Smales
• "Inertial Forces" violate Newton's Third Law
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativity
  • From: Double-A
• Re: Why
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Winds of change
  • From: John Kennaugh