Re: Indefinite problems in Universal physics may be answered




"Koobee Wublee" <kublai@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:R9H2e.1020$ZV5.200@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:6CF2e.18177$C7.7457@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > [...] gravity is space-time curvature [...]
>
> There is a problem with theories explaining gravity as the result of the
> environment around one or several objects/momentum/energy, such as GR.
>
> Let me explain more clearly this time. So, you don't have to dwell on
> personal insult or just sweeping this problem under the carpet.
>
> If there is only one object, we have the object creating a fabric of
> spacetime where all other objects with negligible mass compared to the
> central mass would 'fall' into the curvature of the spacetime. This is
> gravity, and there is no problem with this scenario.
>
> If there are two objects, the fabric of spacetime would have its highest
> degree of curvature right at the center of mass of the two objects. Each
> object would try to 'fall' into the point where the center of mass is.
This
> again is gravity, and there is no problem with this scenario, either.
>
> If there are two objects in the system such as the sun, the earth, and the
> moon, the fabric of spacetime should also have the highest degree of
> curvature at the center of mass of the system.

BTW the highest degree of curvature does not occur at the center of mass of
the system.

> Now, here is the problem.
> When the moon is right in between the sun and the earth, the curvature of
> spacetime cannot have the moon 'fall' into the earth while the earth
'falls'
> into the sun.

Nor does GR say it does - since it does not say anything falls. What is
says is the space-time curvature is such that the moon rotates around the
earth and the earth-moon system rotates around the sun.

> If the earth 'falls' into the sun, the moon should do the
> same thing.

Both the earth and the moon feel the suns gravitation - the earth-moon
system rotates around the sun.

>
> The curvature of spacetime is global. There is no such thing as the
> earth-moon having its own fabric of spacetime independent of the
> sun-earth's. This idea is very different from Newtonian gravity.
> Therefore, this is exactly what Mr. Smith was talking about with that
single
> word remark. That is GR is wrong.

Express your ideas in the language of GR not in some folksy popularist
writing inspired imagery of zero validity.

Bill


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
    ... Centrifugal force is based on treating a Rotating Frame of Reference as if ... earth moving in a straight line and gravity can ONLY act perpendicular ... GR uses the "apparent" position of the Sun ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is gravity relative?
    ... If the sun were to disappear, the earth would continue to orbit ... Let me suppose that the sun suddenly splits into two equal parts flying apart with a speed ~0.9 c, neither of which hits the earth. ... Then yes, knowledge of this splitting would reach the earth simultaneously via light and gravity, ~8 minutes after the split. ... But the "gravitational force" from the sun felt on earth at that time points toward the sun's position in this frame at that time. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Aberation and the Speed of Gravity
    ... The earth is attempting to ... straight line and gravity can ONLY act perpendicular to the current ... it can't be in a circular orbit. ... GR uses the "apparent" position of the Sun ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Whats up with gravity wave detection?
    ... > exactly) and the Earth orbits the sun. 24 hours is the time from noon to noo ... the gravity wave has a frequency of one ... > theorem mathematically and then see if intuition agrees. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Whats up with gravity wave detection?
    ... > exactly) and the Earth orbits the sun. 24 hours is the time from noon to noo ... the gravity wave has a frequency of one ... > theorem mathematically and then see if intuition agrees. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)

Loading