New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:26:44 +0100
Of Time, Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light. Simplified
One Second of time/duration is defined as a radiation count coresponding to
the
transition between the energy levels 2p10 and 5d5 of the krypton-86 atom
of 4.37402759 * 10E13 cycles of krypton-86 atom in vacuum at ~sea level.
One Meter of lengh is defined as 1650736.73 wavelenghths in vacuum at ~sea
level of the radiation coresponding to the transition between the energy
levels
2p10 and 5d5 of the krypton-86 atom.
A vacuum is defined as a medium with a permitivity of 8.854*10E-12 F
mE-1 or e0 and permeability of 4pi * 10E -7 H mE-1 or u0 with the field
state
being ~ sea level.
The following are simple provable or logically deducible facts
a) The speed of light (SOL) is measured constant in vacuum and also in any
given medium. Its speed in vacuum is given the designator c.
b) From a) we can also state that the velocity of the vacuum
is zero with respect to(wrt) the light under measurement at the place of
measurement and is assigned the letters vv otherwise our measurment of
the SOL may have an offset which may need to be calculated in,
in some cases.
c) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source as concluding
otherwise would require the SOL to be dependant on the velocity of the
source which experiments and logic have concluded it is not.
There are three dilectrics that the SOL has to be constant in to comply with
a)
Dilectric of the source = (ds). Of the intevening space/vacuum = (dv)
Of the observer = (do)
a b
Point(p) (ds)( dv )(do)
If (ds),(dv) and (do) have no velocities with respect to each other (the
norm.)
then, if any disturbances caused by the gravity of (ds) and (do) are
calculated out, (do) will observer source (ds) spectral signature(ss)
essentially
as it was transmitted. If on the other hand (ds) has a velocity relative to
(dv)+(do)
then this will be shown by the (ss) showing a deviation from the norm when
observed by (do). In another case (ds) and (do) have no velocity wrt each
other but have a velocity wrt (dv), this more difficult to measure
particularly from (do) with only (ds) as a reference. So for this
measurement we
need to rotate (ds) and (do) round a some distant point (p) so their angular
velocities have a significant difference but they are in line on a line
drawn from
the axis of rotation(p). The other requirement is that there are many other
objects
in (dv) to lock its velocity by majority rule to these other objects.
Using the observed deviation by (do) from the source (ds) on the inner obit
about the point, as a reference against the observed deviation from sources
from the clock and anticlock directions, the velocity of (do) can be
calculated wrt (dv).
d) The conclusion from this is that the constacy of c is maintained
by referencing itself to the vacuum velocity in which its being carried in.
This indicates that the vacuum has n number of velocities and that they can
be deduced from the velocity of c. It needs to be added that the vacuum
accommodates its velocity to the dominant velocity of dominant matter
and/or dominant field in its local area. With the area being defined by the
strength and type of effect.
e) The observer can from observation of the deviation frequency (spectral
shift) of light with a known frequency, determine their velocity with
respect to the vacuum and other sources with respect to the vacuum by a
spectrophotometer and *computation*, in most cases.
f) Many of the examples posted to this group and in establishment books fail
to take account of the above facts and can be misleading both in concept and
formulation. Also many of the past formulae are inappropriately applied
and have been bringing these formulae into disrepute but correctly applied
in the situations for which they were intended they should normally present
no problems.
The following is an updated scenario of the Bill and Paul in space suits
type and includes the effects of length contraction and time dilation
with some reasoning as to the cause of these effects.
We start with Bill and Paul at rest relative to each other in the centre of
a sphere of stars 20 light years away who's average velocity relative to
Bill and Paul is zero. Both Bill and Paul have monochromatic light sources
of which the other has the frequency of and is able to detect any variation
of.
They know they are stationary relative to the surrounding star field by
evaluating the hydrogen spectral line shift from the surrounding stars. They
do some tests and discover that they can determine their velocity with
respect to each other and the surrounding star field by measuring the
frequency shift of the surrounding star field and each others monochromatic
light source. Now they also have watches that they can compare and they find
that if one of them travels away and returns from the other at a c/2 for
example then on his return he finds his watch reads an earlier time to the
other who remained relatively stationary but if they both move away and
return then their watches agree. Weird ain't it as it appears moving slows
you down and you age more slowly. So get off the sofa and run about
otherwise you will be dead earlier :-) Now what is the mechanism for this
weird effect, well we know that as you move faster the shorter you get if
you are going head or feet first and this means that the atoms that make up
your body will be distorted into an ellipsoid shape. Now atoms that have
distorted into an ellipsoid will work/oscillate more slowly than atoms in a
more relaxed spheroid shape. I think this will be shown by the hydrogen line
being shifted when generated by an atom or particle under single axis stress
and other measurements.
Perhaps to be continued.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: PD
- Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: Paul Cardinale
- Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: Harry
- Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: Sue...
- Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- Prev by Date: Re: The Farce that is Called Henri Wilson
- Next by Date: Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- Previous by thread: The bunker-science buster bomb
- Next by thread: Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|