Re: New impoved facts part 1v03


"Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1112696750.26095.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Of Time, Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light. Simplified
>
> One Second of time/duration is defined as a radiation count coresponding
to
> the
> transition between the energy levels 2p10 and 5d5 of the krypton-86 atom
> of 4.37402759 * 10E13 cycles of krypton-86 atom in vacuum at ~sea level.
>
> One Meter of lengh is defined as 1650736.73 wavelenghths in vacuum at ~sea
> level of the radiation coresponding to the transition between the energy
> levels
> 2p10 and 5d5 of the krypton-86 atom.
>
> A vacuum is defined as a medium with a permitivity of 8.854*10E-12 F
> mE-1 or e0 and permeability of 4pi * 10E -7 H mE-1 or u0 with the field
> state
> being ~ sea level.
>
> The following are simple provable or logically deducible facts
>
> a) The speed of light (SOL) is measured constant in vacuum and also in any
> given medium. Its speed in vacuum is given the designator c.
> b) From a) we can also state that the velocity of the vacuum
> is zero with respect to(wrt) the light under measurement at the place of
> measurement and is assigned the letters vv otherwise our measurment of
> the SOL may have an offset which may need to be calculated in,
> in some cases.

Surely you are joking. Right?

> c) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source as concluding
> otherwise would require the SOL to be dependant on the velocity of the
> source which experiments and logic have concluded it is not.

What logic? Now I'm sure, you *are* joking! :-)

> There are three dilectrics that the SOL has to be constant in to comply
with
> a)
> Dilectric of the source = (ds). Of the intevening space/vacuum = (dv)
> Of the observer = (do)
>
> a b
> Point(p) (ds)( dv )(do)
>
> If (ds),(dv) and (do) have no velocities with respect to each other (the
> norm.)
> then, if any disturbances caused by the gravity of (ds) and (do) are
> calculated out, (do) will observer source (ds) spectral signature(ss)
> essentially
> as it was transmitted. If on the other hand (ds) has a velocity relative
to
> (dv)+(do)
> then this will be shown by the (ss) showing a deviation from the norm when
> observed by (do). In another case (ds) and (do) have no velocity wrt each
> other but have a velocity wrt (dv), this more difficult to measure
> particularly from (do) with only (ds) as a reference. So for this
> measurement we
> need to rotate (ds) and (do) round a some distant point (p) so their
angular
> velocities have a significant difference but they are in line on a line
> drawn from
> the axis of rotation(p). The other requirement is that there are many
other
> objects
> in (dv) to lock its velocity by majority rule to these other objects.
> Using the observed deviation by (do) from the source (ds) on the inner
obit
> about the point, as a reference against the observed deviation from
sources
> from the clock and anticlock directions, the velocity of (do) can be
> calculated wrt (dv).
> d) The conclusion from this is that the constacy of c is maintained
> by referencing itself to the vacuum velocity in which its being carried
in.
> This indicates that the vacuum has n number of velocities and that they
can
> be deduced from the velocity of c. It needs to be added that the vacuum
> accommodates its velocity to the dominant velocity of dominant matter
> and/or dominant field in its local area. With the area being defined by
the
> strength and type of effect.
> e) The observer can from observation of the deviation frequency (spectral
> shift) of light with a known frequency, determine their velocity with
> respect to the vacuum and other sources with respect to the vacuum by a
> spectrophotometer and *computation*, in most cases.
> f) Many of the examples posted to this group and in establishment books
fail
> to take account of the above facts and can be misleading both in concept
and
> formulation. Also many of the past formulae are inappropriately applied
> and have been bringing these formulae into disrepute but correctly applied
> in the situations for which they were intended they should normally
present
> no problems.
>
> The following is an updated scenario of the Bill and Paul in space suits
> type and includes the effects of length contraction and time dilation
> with some reasoning as to the cause of these effects.
>
> We start with Bill and Paul at rest relative to each other in the centre
of
> a sphere of stars 20 light years away who's average velocity relative to
> Bill and Paul is zero. Both Bill and Paul have monochromatic light sources
> of which the other has the frequency of and is able to detect any
variation
> of.
> They know they are stationary relative to the surrounding star field by
> evaluating the hydrogen spectral line shift from the surrounding stars.
They
> do some tests and discover that they can determine their velocity with
> respect to each other and the surrounding star field by measuring the
> frequency shift of the surrounding star field and each others
monochromatic
> light source. Now they also have watches that they can compare and they
find
> that if one of them travels away and returns from the other at a c/2 for
> example then on his return he finds his watch reads an earlier time to the
> other who remained relatively stationary but if they both move away and
> return then their watches agree. Weird ain't it as it appears moving slows
> you down and you age more slowly. So get off the sofa and run about
> otherwise you will be dead earlier :-) Now what is the mechanism for this
> weird effect, well we know that as you move faster the shorter you get if
> you are going head or feet first and this means that the atoms that make
up
> your body will be distorted into an ellipsoid shape. Now atoms that have
> distorted into an ellipsoid will work/oscillate more slowly than atoms in
a
> more relaxed spheroid shape. I think this will be shown by the hydrogen
line
> being shifted when generated by an atom or particle under single axis
stress
> and other measurements.
> Perhaps to be continued.
>
>
>
>
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Improved facts
    ... >> a result of relative motion between the source and the observer. ... >> of vacuum and as such is used as a constant. ... >> c) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source with respect ... If a volume of gas has only three particles, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Improved facts
    ... > a result of relative motion between the source and the observer. ... > of vacuum and as such is used as a constant. ... > velocity differences in the observation process. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
    ... >> The local return speed of light through a vacuum is measured to be c ... How can SR communicate across frames if the SOL is not a constant without ... accept that the relative velocity of the vacuum between frames needs to be ... > Yes I am familiar with the method of measurement of the SOL by Fizeau but ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
    ... >> Of Time, Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light. ... >> is zero with respect tothe light under measurement at the place of ... >> the SOL may have an offset which may need to be calculated in, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
    ... >> Of Time, Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light. ... >> is zero with respect tothe light under measurement at the place of ... >> the SOL may have an offset which may need to be calculated in, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)