Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:19:13 +0100
"Harry" <harald.vanlintel@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4252942f$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1112696750.26095.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Of Time, Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light. Simplified
>
> One Second of time/duration is defined as a radiation count coresponding
to
> the
> transition between the energy levels 2p10 and 5d5 of the krypton-86 atom
> of 4.37402759 * 10E13 cycles of krypton-86 atom in vacuum at ~sea level.
>
> One Meter of lengh is defined as 1650736.73 wavelenghths in vacuum at ~sea
> level of the radiation coresponding to the transition between the energy
> levels
> 2p10 and 5d5 of the krypton-86 atom.
>
> A vacuum is defined as a medium with a permitivity of 8.854*10E-12 F
> mE-1 or e0 and permeability of 4pi * 10E -7 H mE-1 or u0 with the field
> state
> being ~ sea level.
>
> The following are simple provable or logically deducible facts
>
> a) The speed of light (SOL) is measured constant in vacuum and also in any
> given medium. Its speed in vacuum is given the designator c.
> b) From a) we can also state that the velocity of the vacuum
> is zero with respect to(wrt) the light under measurement at the place of
> measurement and is assigned the letters vv otherwise our measurment of
> the SOL may have an offset which may need to be calculated in,
> in some cases.
h
Surely you are joking. Right?
d
Well I could be but I'm not.:-) I'm just stating the bloody obvious that all
measurement needs a reference base. This point seems to be missed by some
posters to this group. I hope you are not one of those posters ?
> c) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source as concluding
> otherwise would require the SOL to be dependant on the velocity of the
> source which experiments and logic have concluded it is not.
h
What logic? Now I'm sure, you *are* joking! :-)
d
I'm glad you are so easily amused, I wish I was you must have a hilarous
time I guess it must be that you have a different meaning to the word logic
than I have.:-)
I have sniped the rest in case you suffer a heart attack from laughing to
much. Thanks for the reply.
Dr ***
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: Harry
- Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- References:
- New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: Dr ***
- Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- From: Harry
- New impoved facts part 1v03
- Prev by Date: Re: O'Barr: When all you have is math
- Next by Date: Re: Physics cannot validate the existence anything!
- Previous by thread: Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- Next by thread: Re: New impoved facts part 1v03
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|