Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter


"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1112888829.985998.281460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
d
The e+ and e- are *charges* not particals thats what I was talking
about anyway ???.
The e- and e+ could be a section of radiation moving at c if that sits
more easily with you but I think it may be easier to see how the
partical dischages the charge and to discribe the particals
constrution using stationary static charges..
s
Fractional charges may be just what you need for your recipe but AFAIK
where mama nature buys her groceries, they are not sold that way.
They are so nice and stable in the 0.511 MeV packages that few
ask for them any other way.
d
If you wish to restricte e- and e+ to static charges at 0.511 MeV seperatly
or combined then thats fine by me but as this is not primarily a quantitive
evaluation is it very important ?.
Just state it and we can perhaps be away. I have now include the radiation
path to the diagram and revised 'words discharge path' to 'energy tranfer
path'.

Neutral
v
e+ : e-
(p)
..
r
Radiation

d
Post up the bits that you feel are relevent and lets see if they fit.
You have not posted up the M * M and C * C bits that you claimed to be
relevent.??????
s
<< Coulomb's law describes a force of infinite range which
obeys the inverse square law, and is of the same form
as the gravity force. >>
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elefor.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/grav.html#grav
d
Will look at later but yes I have no disagreement with your abstract and
would also like to add all other forces and events under that umbrela with
some modifications and additions. I did tell you that that was my direction
way back when I first started posting.:-) so I did warn you.
d
The e- and e+ could be a section of radiation moving at c if that sits
more easily with you but I think it may be easier to see how the
partical dischages the charge and to discribe the particals
constrution.
You also need my rotational graph to dig deeper than we are at present.
s
I could try to teach a chicken to lay omlettes too,
but I have resigned myself to accept the product in
it's standard package. ;-)
d
This smacks of defeatism to me I'll smack your bum.:-) I am only trying to
describe how chickens work not to alter their behaviour. We'll put the fancy
bits on latter but lets find out how the engine works before we start the
polishing :-)
Dr ***
Sue...


.