Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter


"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1112958550.509261.130900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
d
Does this mean your not interested in finding out the more practical
answers your above assertions???
s
No. But we have to get the boat where we can remove it from the mold to
answer questions that involve a "collection of charges".
d
I thought the original attempt was just a positive and negative charge of
the smallest convenient size but we seem to have jumped to a collection
without dealing with the pairs??
I don't see why as your limitation of xxxMev was a red herring as that limit
only applied to Electron movement and in fact charge as a voltage can by
taken up to dielectric breakdown and down to 0 and once you are below the
electron quantamisation and involvement of usage the level is clearly
homogenous to zero as far as anybody know, don't you think ???
We can place an artificial quantumization on voltage but this is for
convenience and not dictated by the structure of the vacuum or the voltage.
Maybe we can only deal with charge conveniently in Electron shunks but we
never even got to deal with just two chunks of electron charge not stuck on
electrons. Whats the smallest shunk of charge not attached to a partical you
can deal with ????
s
OK... we still don't know what the heavens are made of or why
there is action at a distance.
d
I thought that was the main purpose of this thread to show that I didn't
know what I was on about when I claimed I knew or at least had a pretty good
idea :-)
s
(We used the taffy principle, in
pulling the e+ and e- from a gamma.)
d
When you use the word gamma in that context what exactly are you referring
to ????
And the taffy principle seem like fudge to me and that's useless at getting
anything to stick:-)
What are you bring confectionery into this for unless your dying for a
chocolate.:-)
s
Except for these two issues, and
atomic structure, what do you think this model omits?
d
How about the main issues :-)
s
It transports Coulomb,
d
How???
s
magnetic
d
How ???
s
and *possibly* graviational forces
d
How ???
s
with patterns and delays consistant with our experience. Eh ?
d
Maybe :-)
Dr ***
Sue...


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: B SR-cult fraud and corruption
    ... transform delta_t' is proportionate to delta_t at any given v. ... >>photons are nothing more than accounting devices that happen to ... >>contributed to by electron fields, that in turn are associated with ... >>conclude that space is curved by charge rather than by mass. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: B SR-cult fraud and corruption
    ... transform delta_t' is proportionate to delta_t at any given v. ... >>photons are nothing more than accounting devices that happen to ... >>contributed to by electron fields, that in turn are associated with ... >>conclude that space is curved by charge rather than by mass. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: B SR-cult fraud and corruption
    ... transform delta_t' is proportionate to delta_t at any given v. ... >>photons are nothing more than accounting devices that happen to ... >>contributed to by electron fields, that in turn are associated with ... >>conclude that space is curved by charge rather than by mass. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Coulombs constant is a CGS kludge
    ... L_C is electron compton wavelength. ... |>| I think you are too serious about spacetime charge. ... But then CGS charge does carry contraband eps0 in its stowage. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Coulombs constant is a CGS kludge
    ... L_C is electron compton wavelength. ... |>| I think you are too serious about spacetime charge. ... But then CGS charge does carry contraband eps0 in its stowage. ...
    (sci.physics)