Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:42:51 +0100
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1112994154.149991.120140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
d
I'm not sure that without a tranfer path via a partical the two charges
will
cancel. They will if they are partical based but potential fields need
somthing else??
====
s
GawdHaMighty! You saw the transfer paths with your own eyes when
the positrons and electrons were pulled apart from a sacred glob of
taffy. Whaddya want, a story about pulling ribs out the first sinner
to construct the second sinner... or it's the other way 'round? ;-)
Something like that will do :-)
====
the
Coulomb force lines linking all the the other charges disappear too.
All the the other charges have to jiggle around and readjust
their lines of force to cover up for the two charges that just
left the ball field. This adjustment begins closest to the
vacated positions and propagates outward with the same
magnetic and inertial delays that damp any other
perturbation. Would you call that adjustment gamma radiation?
d
I very well might although it could be a broad spectrum antibiotic:-)
depending on how the charges cancelled.
s
Charges seem to get on with these sorts of negotiations
pretty reliably when pebbles are thrown in a pond but I''ve
never tried throwing a Tardis in so your caution is surely
warranted.
We can deal some more with the e+ and e- that caused
all this ruckus now if you can figure out where they went to
and how do we get them back
d
They distributed themselves as radiation and they will probably be
absorbed back into some atom
s
What atoms ?
d
Arnt you brewing some up in that old tin :-)
s
All the charges are wearing condoms so they can't have
any.
d
Maternal to the last :-)
d
if any are about and perhaps the remains end up as cbr
being as this is a frequency that not so many atoms are happy to
collect.??
s
The notion has occured this could be another explanation for CMBR.
d
Yep indeed it could.
Hint: The radiation was headed for the cloud's outer boundary.
dielectric interfaces make good reflectors ;-)
d
Some frequencies yes but others go straight through.
s
Oh ? Whose Coulomb lines do they jiggle outside of
the cloud ?
d
Your still in an almighty vacuum that extends for ever so far just because
you have a small bit with a few charges that have modulated a small bit with
a field or two most everthing will escape like rats up drain pipes.:-)
s
What entity outside of the cloud jiggles
to prove any energy exited. IMHO, discontinuity like
that can only make reflections.
Only if you have some effect to hold your gut in will it become stable what
effect are you proposing and what's its mechanism ?:-)
.. It transports Coulomb,
d
How???
s Taffy or messenger unicorns... I am sure of it ;-)
surly you mean fudge:-)
d magnetic How ???
s That is just some kind of Coulomb jiggle or spin or twist.
Something like that Purcell piece, tho I don't think that is
completely acording to Hoyle.
Ampers law, Lorentz force and Ahanorov-Bohm might be
good candidates to study in this kind of cloud.
Ok work it up
s
and *possibly* graviational forces
Coulomb forces are so immensly greater than
gravity there is no risk is assuming some kind of
phantom encoding like the balance function from
that BNL paper that I linked.
d
A very squeaky yes but
Sue...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- References:
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Dr ***
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Dr ***
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Dr ***
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Dr ***
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Dr ***
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Dr ***
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Dr ***
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Dr ***
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Dr ***
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- From: Sue...
- Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- Prev by Date: Re: What's the physical base or cause of inertia?
- Next by Date: Re: New improved facts part 2v031
- Previous by thread: Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- Next by thread: Re: Alice slays Mad Hatter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|