Re: New improved facts part 3v031


"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xui6e.6862$5F3.1768@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"PD" <pdraper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1113135958.475377.270720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Dr *** wrote:
> > "PD" <pdraper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1113071164.994329.121370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Dr *** wrote:
> > > Of accelerate, deceleration, motion and energy.
> > >
> > > ************** Simplified *************
> >
> > Wow, this IS improved. The density of errors has gone WAY up. Too
> high,
> > in fact, for me to start tackling it.
> > PD
> >
> > I thought you might be pleased :-) I have more just wait.
> > It is a pity that you were unable to provide any proof of any of my
> errors
> > so far I suppose in the end you will start to claim that I have not
> taken
> > any note of your illogical assertion and you will be correct for the
> first
> > time :-).
> >
> > Dr ***
>
> Ah, see, and here is where you make a common error about physics. You
> assume that your role is to propose something and that the critic's
> responsibility is to prove you wrong. Unfortunately, this is not how
> science works. The critic might take it upon himself/herself to point
> out places where you are likely wrong, but the burden of proof is on
> nature itself. Your responsibility here is to suggest the experimental
> test that would quantitatively and qualitatively distinguish your
> theory's predictions from the current model's predictions. The comments
> we make are as a courtesy, but we have no onus to "defend" the current
> model from newcomers with a different idea.

Well said. You know a lot of problems would be cleared up if posters simply
would acquaint themselves with the Feynman Lectures before posting. He
examines these issues in the early chapters of the first volume and should
be compulsory reading for everyone interested in physics or science for that
matter. BTW got Penrose's new book. Am going through Zwiebach's book on
string theory at the moment. Will keep the group updated on what I tank
once I start on it.

Anybody that believes in anti causality i.e. Time in reversed electrons I
think it was, needs to be read with care and some scepticism. :-) But it
might be considered good entertainment by some adults but It is probably not
suitable for people like Bill H. and P.D. :-) You might like to drain your
'tank' Bill and give it a good wash out before posting as it appears to be
full of sluge from my pov :-)
Dr ***


.

Relevant Pages

  • RE: RRAS stopped - NO VPN or internal NAT
    ... Thank you for posting back and many thanks for your sharing of the troubleshoot experience. ... Bill Peng ... Double click Routing and Remote Access service in the right pane. ... >> Filemon for Windows ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Not of Interest? But how?
    ... alt.accountancy seems to have reject you Bill so I have reposted just to ... The speed of light is measured on the moon and on the earth. ... You had already been posting to a whole range of groups earlier in this ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OT--(was: Taking on city hall) Top Posting vs. bottom posting
    ... Snip ... > comments into a quoted article: an inline quoted posting. ... >> (according to Bill and Larry) ... >> evolution that has happened in usenet habits recently) ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • THE PENULTIMATE PREDICTIONS OF KARNAK!!!
    ... <echo echo echo echo echo> ... These predictions are "penultimate" because I have to read the books ... 1) Snape is NOT "Not Evil", ... BILL IS AN IMPOSTER: A Death Eater has replaced Bill, ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: IM SELLING A FOLK ACOUSTIC GUITAR
    ... we, or rather I, would like to stop posting here. ... Have a good day, Bill. ... Bill Chandler ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.acoustic)