photons

From: "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:07:40 +0100

Does anybody disagree that photons are electric field wave packets comprised
of at least two wavelengths carrier and modulator, in radio terms. The
frequencies and amplitude of which are dictated by the structure emitting
them and this in no way can be taken to indicate that the electric fields
themselves are quantumized.
Dr ***

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: photons
  - From: Bilge
- Re: photons
  - From: Sue...
- Re: photons
  - From: Tom Roberts
- Re: photons
  - From: FrediFizzx
- Re: photons
  - From: Paul Cardinale
- Re: photons
  - From: PD

Prev by Date: Re: Some Philosopy q's
Next by Date: Aberration re stars
Previous by thread: Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?
Next by thread: Re: photons
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: An Even Better OWLS Experiment.
... it isn't for all frequencies. ... >> with the electric field of this light, some gain energy and ... The light waves emitted by the electron ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: An Even Better OWLS Experiment.
... it isn't for all frequencies. ... >> with the electric field of this light, some gain energy and ... The light waves emitted by the electron ...
(sci.physics)