Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:23:22 +0100
"sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42640db7$0$79456$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1113849791.21249.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4263ec59$0$79457$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1113836465.26594.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:4263bee7$0$79456$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Dr ***" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1113830717.11394.2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > dr
> > > No, but their complexity can be extracted for analysis of both them
and
> > > the state that remains.
> > s
> > Yes... this is the same notion as using the Faraday shielded loop.
> > It seems a more complex way to study a dipole but in fact it
> > is setting one of the complexities (Coulomb coupling) against itself
> > so you can study the magnetic component.
> > Dr
> > I must admit that I don't full grasp what you are doing and the exact
> output
> > and design of your loops and circuitry arraignment so cant really
analyse
> > it.
> s
> Perhaps if I state the reason we are doing it.
>
> If we want to measure the Coulomb force we can simply
> charge a capacitor and wedge a bathroom scale between
> the plates.
> s
> If we want to measure the Lorentz force
dr
I dont have any references on Lorentz *force* ?
s
> we want to
> slide the charged plates past each other because the
> force acts at 90 degress to the motion. All kinds of
> geometry problems and:
> dr
> You are refering to contraction effects ?
s
No... not at all. A pedestrian might push on a
parked motorcycle and reasonably guess its
weight... but not the same motorcycle passing by
at 30km/s. You need a way to null one component
to measure the other. It is just geometry.
If a lion creeps directly toward it's prey the motion
is nearly invisible. The same creeping on a 90 degree
vector will set off all the fright flight and fight alarms.
> s
> Above about 200 Hz, springs start flying out of the
> apparatus: the owner starts complaining of a diet
> sliding and overloaded plates...ect.
> dr
> What sort of distances are trying to move at 200 Hz ?
> s
> The coils and shields of a selective coupling structures aren't
> actually eliminating either component, they are simply
> balancing one against itself, so we can observer the other.
>
> So, work to your hearts content to un-unify electromagnetism.
> if you like. The key is likely in the same drawer where the
> magnetic monopoles are stored. ;-)
> dr
> I'm not trying to un-unify electromagnetism except for analytical purposes
> and AFAK magnetic monopoles are not a practical possibility.
<< for analytical purposes >> Eh ?
We establish E and H planes so we can do this
and adhere to a fairly well tested (100 years ) set
of geometric relations.
dr
I thought at one stage you were saying that H plane traveled between stars,
Purcell?
Having trouble with the testing, perhaps its the 100year old equipment :-)
s
There is a cold drafty monistary high in the Himalayas
where physiscists who have a *better idea* can go
and rewrite the whole body of electromagnetism and
everything built on it by hand. Are you volunteering ?
dr
Were did you think I'm posting from :-)
This is not what I'm about there are just some discrepancies that need
fixing IMHO.
Sue...
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > <<voltage has a direct relationship with velocity in my model >>
> > s
> > The velocity of what? Your boots as you step from a ceiling
> > joist to the center of slab of styrofoam tile ?
> > dr
> > The vacuum characteristic at that area in space as generated by the
> > energy/voltage differential applied.
> s
> That is GLOB-SPEAK! Go tell your wife you need
> a spanking. :-)
> dr
> Ok had spanking but still of the same mind, is GLOB-SPEAK something to do
> with the poster Glo-bar ?
> Ok in your terms the Coulomb forces the exist in an area of space but I
feel
> this can be misconstrued.:-)
> Dr ***
> Sue...
>
>
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- References:
- + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: Dr ***
- Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- From: sue jahn
- + 1E + -1E = 0E
- Prev by Date: Re: photons
- Next by Date: Re: Examining Einstein's 1920 paper
- Previous by thread: Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- Next by thread: Re: + 1E + -1E = 0E
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|