Re: 2nd clarification of Burris's Unified Field Theory


"Lloyd Burris" <reactor1967@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1114623367.366629.8950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Well again people had a hard time understanding me so I again went back
> and tried to write more clearly.

I notice you still have not addressed the issue of EM being a 4 vector and
gravity a tensor. Just what do you think you will accomplish by posting the
same stuff without addressing fundamental flaws?


>The saying that you can please some of
> the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time
> is true.

That is not the issue - the issue is it is nonsense from very elementary
considerations.

Bill

> Im not going to post my copyrighted material but I will post
> my links to the pic graphicly and with text depicting my theory. Here
> you go.
>
> http://members.fortunecity.com/reactor1967/btheory.jpg
> or
> http://www.geocities.com/reactor1967/btheory.jpg
>


.