Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:00:31 GMT
"Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1114650102.388185.269750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Comparisons between SR and LET.
>
>
> Statement now accepted by SR experts:
> SR and LET are scientifically equivalent theories.
>
> The above has to be accepted for several reasons.
> They have the same math. They use the same math
> transforms. They make the same identical math
> predictions. This means that any fact found to
> support SR also supports LET. This means that if SR
> has found any support that indicates that it might be
> correct, then LET has that same support, to the exact
> same degree. If one is proved to be in error, so
> will the other. In other words, we have, so far,
> not been able to find any test that could distinguish
> between these two theories. In principle we should
> be able to do this, but in practice, no such testing
> presently exists or is known.
In principle we should not be able to do this - that is exactly what
mathematical equivalent means.
Rest snipped.
Bill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- References:
- Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Prev by Date: Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
- Next by Date: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Previous by thread: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Next by thread: Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
