Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.

Harry:
>
>"Llanzlan Klazmon" <Klazmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:Xns964792E00D882Klazmonllurdiaxorbgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> news:1114650102.388185.269750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>> > Comparisons between SR and LET.
>> >
>> >
>> > Statement now accepted by SR experts:
>> > SR and LET are scientifically equivalent theories.
>> >
>>
>> Which one has the least assumptions?
>>
>> Klazmon.
>
>That depends how you count it: as long as it's understood that SRT as used
>by O'Barr doesn't contain the assumption that space-time exists, SRT has
>less assumptions then SRT-Lorentz ("LET"), by the simple fact that "LET"
>adds an explanation to SRT.

By comparison, if you include your silly notion that the
assumption that ``spacetime exists'' should count as a postulate,
you have to replace it by three silly postulates for LET: (1) space
exists, (2) time exists, (3) a postulate that explains why the two
should be related.

>Note that some geometers claim that Spacetime exists (for which extension we
>might use the label "SSR"), and that form of SRT has therefore the same
>number of assumptions as "LET".

You are a complete buffoon.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E4ngenkontraktion_einer_Scheibe?=
    ... von der GGP und eben nicht von der SRT, ... GGP ausgehen sollte. ... Diese Postulate sind natürlich nicht einfach vom Himmel gefallen, ... Beobachtung, daß die physikalischen Gesetze in allen ...
    (de.sci.physik)
  • Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
    ... >>That depends how you count it: as long as it's understood that SRT ... >>by O'Barr doesn't contain the assumption that space-time exists, ... > exists, time exists, a postulate that explains why the two ... Time I don't think so, but instead motion does exist. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: energiebedarf bei Beschleunigung nahe c
    ... leiten sie die SRT so einfach her, ... die Postulate annimmt, kann man eigentlich gar nicht anders als zur SRT ...
    (de.sci.physik)
  • Re: Difference between predictions of SR and LET - perhaps!
    ... SR has different metaphysics (some four-dimensional ... Actually that is wrong - except if Einstein's version of SRT is not ... 4D spacetime as a useful *mathematical* aspect of ... theory of relativity, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Followup: Lorentz v. Einstein on SR
    ... > Einstein's second postulate is therefore very reasonable. ... Lorentz' interpretation of SRT is just an interpretation, ... Einstein. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)