Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.

In <1114795916.254639.127490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
TC <tcla...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ... Any and everything
>> done by SR is also able to be done by LET,
>> or else these two theories are not equivalent.

TC wrote:
> The two theories are not equivalent.
> For one, SRT is the flat space limit of GRT.
> LET is not.
>LET is only equivalent to SRT at the time of first
>1905 paper when the only thing being compared was
> Lorentz-Fitzgerald transforms.
>They started to diverge with E=mc^2 in the second
> 1905 SRT paper.

Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> comments:
And this is your answer to the previous post? You
only copied these three lines? Three lines out of
the entire post? It is instructive to note that what
is not said, is just as important as what is said.
And you show your total defeat in how you run away
from almost everything that was said in this last
post! I should just repeat the last post and call it
a day until you do justice by what was pointed out to
you.

Yes, you are correct. SR, as a theory, has
changed much. But as we consider these changes, you
must also note that the math has not changed at all.
What has been going on, in SR, is a change of words.
At first there was none of this 4-D junk. There were
never these statements that in SR there were no real
changes, that the only changes were just changes in
perspectives, etc., etc., etc. Yes, with all these
changes in excuses or word explanations, the math
remains the same.

You tried to make SR important by saying it is
connected to GR. Well, in full faith, GR is SR, or
SR is GR, in this limit. And so, if SR fails, so
does GR. I have no reasons to fear GR, because GR is
SR and so it is GR that is in danger, not LET. You
have your science exactly backwards, and this is what
mathematicians usually do. Mathematicians have
almost zero concepts of reality, and almost no
concepts of causality. They reject such limits, and
desire full freedom to make their mathematics
anything they want. But this is now ended. And your
sickness is easily seen!
If LET is superior to SR, and it is, then it is
also automatically superior to GR. That is the way
that logic works. It cannot work the way you say!
It is sick to suppose that SR is in some mysterious
way held up by GR! In the real world, SR and GR are
the same, not two of anything at all. You can make
math separations all you want, but physically, they
cannot be separated. If SR fails, then so does GR,
in the exact same way!
And I am getting tired of all these false
statements you seem to be driven to make. Do you
have a reason why you feel obligated to make these
false points for SR, even if it is now a lost cause?
How sick can you be if you are not open to something
better, when it has been adequately explained?

Now I hope you will please forgive me, for assuming
so many things. I do not really know who you are.
You might be some high school kid. And so I surely
should not be making an issue over anything. So if I
am stepping over the line, as I said, I hope you will
forgive me. Usually I wait until I know someone
before I throw the book at them.


But however it might be,
thanks again for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>
+ Remove 3 dots for e-mail.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: James Harris is going to Pop.
    ... That has never before been seen and it chops up a lot of crap that math ... Now go read up on class number and see how wrong mathematicians got it ... And notice now the insults. ... I WILL GET MY MONEY If you fucking morons think that I will let ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: James Harris is going to Pop.
    ... Instead of ever asking questions, he insults, time for this Crackpot/Troll ... "mathematicians" decided they couldn't be bothered with telling the truth. ... That has never before been seen and it chops up a lot of crap that math ... I WILL GET MY MONEY If you fucking morons think that I will let you get ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: James Harris is going to POP! AGAIN !
    ... Instead of ever asking questions, he insults, time for this Crackpot/Troll ... when I am FUCKING CONCEDING HIS MAIN GODDAMN ... "mathematicians" decided they couldn't be bothered with telling the truth. ... That has never before been seen and it chops up a lot of crap that math ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Your funeral
    ... at a factoring algorithm (or a short proof of FLT, ... article is mostly made of examples) is of mathematicians ... Just math. ... by finding some convincing math and telling us all about it ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: James Harris is going to Pop.
    ... Instead of ever asking questions, he insults, time for this Crackpot/Troll ... "mathematicians" decided they couldn't be bothered with telling the truth. ... That has never before been seen and it chops up a lot of crap that math ... I WILL GET MY MONEY If you fucking morons think that I will let you get ...
    (sci.math)