sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Polarized light.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: The speed of light.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: The velocity of light.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: shuba
• Re: If
  • From: *** rD
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: If
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Poisson Equation & Cosmological Term
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Polarized light.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: time waves
  • From: TomGee
• The velocity of light.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• The speed of light.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: time waves
  • From: *** rD
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativistic rotational kinetic energy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: If 0<>0
  • From: *** rD
• Re: If 0<>0
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• relativistic rotational kinetic energy
  • From: mikecoon
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: macromitch
• If 0<>0
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: If
  • From: *** rD
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: xxein
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: sal
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: shuba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: shuba
• Re: On syntropy and evolution
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: shuba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: BottleBob
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Living in a world with high speeds
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Traveler
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: If
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: time waves
  • From: TomGee
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: harry
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• If
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: red laser in vacuum
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: sal
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Traveler
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: johnreed take 14 - 2005
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: red laser in vacuum
  • From: Neil G
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Neil G
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: None
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Neil G
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Neil G
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Neil G
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Living in a world with high speeds
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Living in a world with high speeds
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: Living in a world with high speeds
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: tensorial product
  • From: sal
• Re: johnreed take 14 - 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: johnreed take 14 - 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: sal
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: sal
• Re: Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: sal
• Re: red laser in vacuum
  • From: PDraper
• Re: Living in a world with high speeds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Baugh
• Re: i still cant get it
  • From: gestor
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Baugh
• Re: red laser in vacuum
  • From: gestor
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: gestor
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Baugh
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: gestor
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: gestor
• Re: Living in a world with high speeds
  • From: gestor
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Living in a world with high speeds
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: Harry
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: ajiko
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: red laser in vacuum
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: ande452
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: ande452
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: i still cant get it
  • From: ande452
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: ande452
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Bilge
• Conundrum of Mass and Energy
  • From: BottleBob
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Nick
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Nick
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Nick
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: Bill Hobba
• i still cant get it
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: sal
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• which is better for realtivity
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Curious
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Curious
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Curious
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: red laser in vacuum
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: red laser in vacuum
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: modelling light
  • From: η ταχύτητα του φωτός
• Re: modelling light
  • From: PD
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: PD
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: red laser in vacuum
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: Harry
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Harry
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Harry
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: ande452
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: red laser in vacuum
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: modelling light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Curious
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Curious
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein: Newton's cancer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Curious
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: modelling light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• modelling light
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• red laser in vacuum
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: PD
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• what is stronger
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: WHAT DEFINES AN INERTIAL FRAME (was Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?)
  • From: shuba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Harry
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: TomGee
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Harry
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The future of this newsgroup.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: jem
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein: Newton's cancer
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Einstein: Newton's cancer
  • From: Harry
• Re: Poisson Equation & Cosmological Term
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Poisson Equation & Cosmological Term
  • From: pmichalicka
• Re: Poisson Equation & Cosmological Term
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Poisson Equation & Cosmological Term
  • From: Peter Michalicka
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: time waves
  • From: Bilge
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time waves
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: Harry
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: time waves
  • From: Nick
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Einstein: Newton's cancer
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: ande452
• Re: time waves
  • From: ande452
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: ande452
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: ande452
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: ande452
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: jcgonsowski
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Nick
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The future of this newsgroup.
  • From: n
• Re: The future of this newsgroup.
  • From: n
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: n
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Poisson Equation & Cosmological Term
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• simple question on twin paradox
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: randamajor
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: La velocidad de la Luz
• Re: the basic of matter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Bilge
• the basic of matter
  • From: Los Coxones
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: vern
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Neil G
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: TomGee
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Baugh
• kerr geometry
  • From: karan
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: Harry
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: jem
• Re: increasing disorder
  • From: Neil G
• Re: increasing disorder
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• the basis of relativity
  • From: Neil G
• Re: increasing disorder
  • From: Neil G
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Neil G
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: johnreed take 14 - 2005
  • From: Baugh
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: vern
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Poisson Equation & Cosmological Term
  • From: Peter Michalicka
• Re: time waves
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Harry
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Nick
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: time waves
  • From: Nick
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Bill, it's like this...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: increasing disorder
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The future of this newsgroup.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 14 - 2005
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Unified Field Theory by Lloyd Dudley Burris
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• A Unified Field Theory by Lloyd Dudley Burris
  • From: Lloyd Burris
• Re: time waves
  • From: Dr ***
• johnreed take 14 - 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: randamajor
• Re: increasing disorder
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The future of this newsgroup.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The future of this newsgroup.
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: The future of this newsgroup.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Harry
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: Harry
• The future of this newsgroup.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: vern
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: David Johnson
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Does GR explain why orbiting clocks lose time
  • From: Harry
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: Harry
• Re: braked acceleration
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Traveler
• Re: black light laser
  • From: boulion
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: black light laser
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Curious
• Re: black light laser
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Andreas Höss
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Harry
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: how to make money on relativiy
  • From: ande452
• Re: How Dare Could America Industrial Property Office Be In Conspiracy With Jungang International Patent Office To Make An Extravagant International Crime ?
  • From: ande452
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: shuba
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: PD
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Twittering One
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Curious
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does GR explain why orbiting clocks lose time
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: David Johnson
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: shuba
• Re: Does GR explain why orbiting clocks lose time
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does GR explain why orbiting clocks lose time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Does GR explain why orbiting clocks lose time
  • From: Curious
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Curious
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: shuba
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Andreas Höss
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Curious
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Andreas Höss
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: harry
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: harry
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: harry
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Andreas Höss
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: ande452
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: Bilge
• Re: organized matter - life
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: Grok42
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: Baugh
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: Grok42
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• another mistake in physics
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: tetrahedron
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Bilge
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Baugh
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Curious
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Curious
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Gene McGraw
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: YBM
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Andreas Höss
• Re: A dumb question about time..
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• A dumb question about time..
  • From: Andreas Höss
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: making jokes on relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The Nature of Mass
  • From: Skrow
• making jokes on relativity
  • From: rex
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: organized matter - life
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: organized matter - life
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• organized matter - life
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: it shows up that we were fools
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: harry
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: parallelepiped
• how to make money on relativiy
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: how cells time accomodate in order to respect relativity priciples?
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: EL
• Re: time waves
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: David Johnson
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Dennis
• Re: how cells time accomodate in order to respect relativity priciples?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: how to predict a prediction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: how to predict a prediction
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: modeling light in femlab / matlab
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: parallelepiped
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: Bilge
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Curious
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• how to predict a prediction
  • From: qwerty
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: qwerty
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: qwerty
• Re: photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time waves
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: harry
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• photon correlation in five easy steps
  • From: qwerty
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Bill, it's like this...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: einstein failed scholar examination
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Curious
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Curious
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Traveler
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Harry
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Harry
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: einstein failed scholar examination
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: einstein failed scholar examination
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: ande452
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: Bilge
• Re: how cells time accomodate in order to respect relativity priciples?
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: xxein
• SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: braked acceleration
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: einstein failed scholar examination
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: EL
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Hunter
• Re: Bill, it's like this...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: Hunter
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: PD
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: vern
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: qwerty
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Curious
• modeling light in femlab / matlab
  • From: qwerty
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: qwerty
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: qwerty
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: qwerty
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: qwerty
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: qwerty
• einstein failed scholar examination
  • From: qwerty
• Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: qwerty
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: qwerty
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: qwerty
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: YBM
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: time waves
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: David Johnson
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Curious
• Re: master and phd in physics form internet universities
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• How long is a muon when at rest?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: vern
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Baugh
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Curious
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Curious
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: qwerty
• Re: relative motion and aging
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• relative motion and aging
  • From: Curious
• Re: how cells time accomodate in order to respect relativity priciples?
  • From: tetanos
• how cells time accomodate in order to respect relativity priciples?
  • From: tetanos
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bill, it's like this...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: braked acceleration
  • From: tetanos
• Re: braked acceleration
  • From: tetanos
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Traveler
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: braked acceleration
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Bill, it's like this...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Bill, it's like this...
  • From: tetanos
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: tetanos
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: what are mini- black holes
  • From: tetanos
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: vern
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: tetanos
• Re: Bill, it's like this...
  • From: tetanos
• Re: Bill, it's like this...
  • From: tetanos
• master and phd in physics form internet universities
  • From: tetanos
• avoid redirecting your posts to alt.morons etc
  • From: tetanos
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: it shows up that we were fools
  • From: tetanos
• Re: it shows up that we were fools
  • From: tetanos
• Re: time waves
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Meaning of General Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: I Owe Einstein an Apology. Sorry Albert!
  • From: GWBush
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: ande452
• Re: it shows up that we were fools
  • From: ande452
• Re: how to learn relativity in 21 days
  • From: ande452
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: ande452
• Re: * * * Important Please Read * * * May 18, 2005 6:53:38 pm (Best Viewed at 1024x768) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  • From: ande452
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: what are mini- black holes
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• Black hole with asymptotically flat interior
  • From: Hunter
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: EL
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: xxein
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: shuba
• Re: it shows up that we were fools
  • From: Greysky
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: a master degree in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: tetanos
• it shows up that we were fools
  • From: tetanos
• it shows up that we were fools
  • From: tetanos
• Re: How to Spot a Voodoo Physicist
  • From: tetanos
• a master degree in physics
  • From: tetanos
• Re: How to Spot a Voodoo Physicist
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: harry
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: harry
• Re: how to learn relativity in 21 days
  • From: tetanos
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How to Spot a Voodoo Physicist
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: how to learn relativity in 21 days
  • From: tetanos
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: how to learn relativity in 21 days
  • From: PD
• Re: how to learn relativity in 21 days
  • From: PD
• Re: How to Spot a Voodoo Physicist
  • From: Traveler
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: braked acceleration
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black light laser
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How to Spot a Voodoo Physicist
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Astrophysical Observations: Lensing and Eclipsing Einstein's Theories
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: How to Spot a Voodoo Physicist
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: time waves
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: time travel
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: EL
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: black light laser
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will NIST fix their tables?
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: black light laser
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: bilge redirect inocent peoples posts to alt.fucknozzles
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: black light laser
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Will NIST fix their tables?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: time travel
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Baugh
• Re: time waves
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Will NIST fix their tables?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Hunter
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Baugh
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: YBM
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: black light laser
  • From: PD
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transforms physical incoherence
  • From: Bilge
• Contacting Author of the Book "Relativity Visualized"
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black light laser
  • From: Bilge
• Re: time waves
  • From: Bilge
• Re: time travel
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: black light laser
  • From: PD
• Re: black light laser
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: black light laser
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: time waves
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Hunter
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: what are mini- black holes
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: dilating light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: boulion
• Re: dirk works on google?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• dirk works on google?
  • From: boulion
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: dilating light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• dilating light
  • From: asbest
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: asbest
• Re: lies and relativity
  • From: asbest
• Re: black light
  • From: asbest
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: asbest
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: bad breath
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black light
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: black light
  • From: George
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: lies and relativity
  • From: ande452
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: ande452
• Re: time waves
  • From: ande452
• Re: molecular attraction
  • From: ande452
• Re: molecular attraction
  • From: ande452
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: ande452
• Re: divergens of magnetic flux
  • From: ande452
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: molecular attraction
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: divergens of magnetic flux
  • From: PD
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Will NIST fix their tables?
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: vern
• Re: time waves
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: divergens of magnetic flux
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: time waves
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: molecular attraction
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: time waves
  • From: Bilge
• johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: randamajor
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Bilge
• Re: time waves
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: black light
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: time waves
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: time waves
  • From: TomGee
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: time waves
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black light
  • From: PD
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will NIST fix their tables?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: black light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: time waves
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Will NIST fix their tables?
  • From: GarryDenke
• Re: black light
  • From: George
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: harry
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: harry
• Re: black light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: vern
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: maybe we should focus on mars
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: lies and relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: black light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: lies and relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: xxein
• Re: black light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: lies and relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: RL Gerl
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: lies and relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black light
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Benno Muilwyk
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Hunter
• Re: Relativistic angular kinetic energy
  • From: RP
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Relativistic angular kinetic energy
  • From: mikecoon
• Re: Communicating at Translight Velocities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: jem
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: kenseto
• Communicating at Translight Velocities
  • From: Sseca
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Bruno Campanini
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Bruno Campanini
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: EL
• Re: Matter Energy & Time
  • From: TomGee
• Re: What are relativists?
  • From: Baugh
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• What are relativists?
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures
  • From: EL
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: xxein
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Matter Energy & Time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: Jan Bielawski
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: shuba
• Re: why is relativity important
  • From: Dan
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: PD
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: gravity shield
  • From: PD
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Journalists' perception of Einstein
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: shevek
• Re: Journalists' perception of Einstein
  • From: russell
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: jem
• Re: Journalists' perception of Einstein
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Journalists' perception of Einstein
  • From: russell
• Re: Journalists' perception of Einstein
  • From: russell
• Re: Journalists' perception of Einstein
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Journalists' perception of Einstein
  • From: russell
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Journalists' perception of Einstein
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Journalists' perception of Einstein
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Links to FAQ need to be updated.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: EL
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: ande452
• Re: light as standing wave
  • From: ande452
• Re: gravity shield
  • From: ande452
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: light as standing wave
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: vern
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: xxein
• Re: Links to FAQ need to be updated.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: gravity shield
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Gravity Energy Muddle
  • From: xxein
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Curious
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: light as standing wave
  • From: Bilge
• MEaT: Matter Energy & Time
  • From: Ron Poteet
• Re: light as standing wave
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: vern
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Links to FAQ need to be updated.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: light as standing wave
  • From: Harry
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: maybe we should focus on mars
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: why is relativity important
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Dr ***
• Links to FAQ need to be updated.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Experiment in Time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: math for morons like us
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: jem
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: vern
• Re: maybe we should focus on mars
  • From: PD
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Support N.Korea's Nukes...Shop at Walmart
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Experiment in Time
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: light as standing wave
  • From: Harry
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: light as standing wave
  • From: Bilge
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Bilge
• Re: why is relativity important
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Support N.Korea's Nukes...Shop at Walmart
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Experiment in Time
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Paul Hollister
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: why is relativity important
  • From: ande452
• Re: what are mini- black holes
  • From: ande452
• Re: maybe we should focus on mars
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: maybe we should focus on mars
  • From: ande452
• Re: light as standing wave
  • From: ande452
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: EL
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: why is relativity important
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: maybe we should focus on mars
  • From: PD
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: maybe we should focus on mars
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: why is relativity important
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Some bad news for Aleksandar Vukelja (I think)
  • From: shuba
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: None
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: bad breath
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: ray
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: ray
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: ray
• light as standing wave
  • From: ray
• Two particles... relative distance - tricky question not resolved
  • From: Curious
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: ltibboor
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: ltibboor
• Re: Lorentz transforms physical incoherence
  • From: shuba
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: EL
• Re: Experiment in Time
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: shevek
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: shevek
• Re: Experiment in Time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: looter92
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Cosmology & Planck Era
  • From: pmichalicka
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Experiment in Time
  • From: Bernardz
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Support N.Korea's Nukes...Shop at Walmart
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Isn't the entire universe a black hole?
  • From: Dan
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Muddle
  • From: EL
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: EL
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: suchita.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: suchita.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: xxein
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Experiment in Time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Einstein's Muddle
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: xxein
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: tuppence
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: tuppence
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: tuppence
• Experiment in Time
  • From: Postman
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: EL
• Re: Event horizon inside--out
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Event horizon inside--out
  • From: tuppence
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Baugh
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Baugh
• Re: is time periodic
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Isn't the entire universe a black hole?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Baugh
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: shevek
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Measuring density of universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Pressure / Casimir Effect / Universe
  • From: pmichalicka
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1
  • From: Bilge
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: EL
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: shuba
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Pressure / Casimir Effect / Universe
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Measuring density of universe
  • From: suchita.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: PD
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: xxein
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Pressure / Casimir Effect / Universe
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The Universe is a Free Lunch
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: photon reflection
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: n
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Einstein Hoax
  • From: Curious
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: n
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
  • From: Dag Oestvang
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: n
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
  • From: Bilge
• The Universe is a Free Lunch
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Bilge
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: n
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Pressure / Casimir Effect / Universe
  • From: pmichalicka
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1
  • From: Dan
• Re: Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1
  • From: Dan
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Baugh
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Baugh
• Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
  • From: Dag Oestvang
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: n
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: xxein
• Re: Warped Vacuum?
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1
  • From: xxein
• Warped Vacuum?
  • From: n
• Re: do u agree with einstein ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Three Blind Mice
  • From: xxein
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: do u agree with einstein ?
  • From: YBM
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: shuba
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: do u agree with einstein ?
  • From: Jean DAVID
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: On 5D vs 4D (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: On 5D vs 4D (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: On 5D vs 4D (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: vern
• Three Blind Mice
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Harry
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Baugh
• Re: general relativity is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On 5D vs 4D (kst)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: comets and asteroids geodesic path
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: do u agree with einstein ?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: On 5D vs 4D (kst)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: On 5D vs 4D (kst)
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The essence of Einstein
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: harry
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The essence of Einstein
  • From: Harry
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• On 5D vs 4D (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Perspective
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: The essence of Einstein
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The essence of Einstein
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Perpetual Motion: Hammers spinning in space?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Perpetual Motion: Hammers spinning in space?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr & Relative motion causing absolute Proper time differences?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: greywolf42
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: shuba
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: riedt1
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Help locating SRT experiement articles
  • From: Steven
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: do u agree with einstein ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: shuba
• Re: comets and asteroids geodesic path
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Isn't the entire universe a black hole?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: string theory and the surplus dimensions
  • From: PD
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Perpetual Motion: Hammers spinning in space?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Isn't the entire universe a black hole?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: n
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Perpetual Motion: Hammers spinning in space?
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Isn't the entire universe a black hole?
  • From: Dr ***
• Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Dr ***
• do u agree with einstein ?
  • From: Jean DAVID
• Re: Perpetual Motion: Hammers spinning in space?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Isn't the entire universe a black hole?
  • From: Bernardz
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Isn't the entire universe a black hole?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Dimension
  • From: Twittering One
• Dimension
  • From: Dr ***
• Isn't the entire universe a black hole?
  • From: Dan
• Re: THE MOST ELECTRIFYING EVENT IN HUMAN HISTORY
  • From: Dan
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: shuba
• Re: Perpetual Motion: Hammers spinning in space?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Perpetual Motion: Hammers spinning in space?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Perpetual Motion: Hammers spinning in space?
  • From: 555666hahaha
• THE MOST ELECTRIFYING EVENT IN HUMAN HISTORY
  • From: Godyssey
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: O'Barr & Relative motion causing absolute Proper time differences?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: n
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: riedt1
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Non Ame to Ken S. Tucker...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: greywolf42
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: O'Barr & Relative motion causing absolute Proper time differences?
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Help locating SRT experiement articles
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Dr ***
• Help locating SRT experiement articles
  • From: Steven
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Traveler
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Dr ***
• Multiple Dimensions!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: light bended near massive bodys
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: collapsing star
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: shuba
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: riedt1
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What are local frames in GR?
  • From: xxein
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: xxein
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Baugh
• Re: light bended near massive bodys
  • From: PD
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: shuba
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: how do matter tell space how to bend?
  • From: PD
• Re: string theory and the surplus dimensions
  • From: PD
• Re: waves cannot exists without medium
  • From: PD
• Re: My new physics hero...
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: kenseto
• Re: light bended near massive bodys
  • From: PD
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Caltech Football Team
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Bilge
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Baugh
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: White House Idiot
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: black hole is an oximoron
  • From: PD
• Re: Can you remove a particle from its frame of reference? <eom>
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: why Pray to God , pray to George
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Two photons... relative distance question
  • From: Curious
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: why Pray to God , pray to George
  • From: Curious
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
  • From: Dag Oestvang
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations
  • From: Elif
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: SR question
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• morley mitchelson experiment
  • From: n
• Re: He was using Jupiter's moons to determine his longitude.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: SR question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Harry
• Re: Can you remove a particle from its frame of reference? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 7v034
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Harry
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: why Pray to God , pray to George
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SR question
  • From: lzwnews
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: ande452
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: ande452
• Re: SR question
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Fight Communism Boycott Walmart and Home Depot
  • From: ande452
• SR question
  • From: lzwnews
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: New improved facts part 7v034
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: Baugh
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• why Pray to God , pray to George
  • From: sue jahn
• dirk liar, Bush liar
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: New improved facts part 7v034
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: New improved facts part 7v034
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Best guvmtt money cay by
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Fight Communism Boycott Walmart and Home Depot
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Texas Justice
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Texas Justice
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Fight Communism Boycott Walmart and Home Depot
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: White House Idiot
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Frist bounces mail
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: White House Idiot
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: Boycott Walmar and Home Depot tWho does the President work for?
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Frisst and cheer Skirts
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: White House Idiot
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: AllYou!
• The biggest 'WHAT IF' in scientific history.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Frisst and cheer Skirts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: White House Idiot
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Jan Bielawski
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: The Inquisition
  • From: ande452
• Re: Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: ande452
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Goebel / Rove
  • From: ande452
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: ande452
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: ande452
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: shuba
• Re: White House Idiot
  • From: ande452
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Boycott Walmar and Home Depot tWho does the President work for?
  • From: ande452
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: riedt1
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: Daniel G. Emilio
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Frisst and cheer Skirts
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: xxein
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Sue...
• Boycott Walmar and HomeDepot / deal a blow to slave labor
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Bilge
• Frisst and cheer Skirts
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Paradigmatic Change.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: My new physics hero...
  • From: Dr ***
• He was using Jupiter's moons to determine his longitude.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Sue...
• Boycott Walmar and Home Depot tWho does the President work for?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Sue...
• Frist bounces mail
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Dirk http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti99/advancepgm.html
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
  • From: Daniel Weston
• White House Idiot
  • From: sue jahn
• "You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron"
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Dirk http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti99/advancepgm.html
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: New improved facts part 7v034
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The big bang.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New improved facts part 7v034
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The big bang.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Curious
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Curious
• Re: My new physics hero...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: anthonyroseuk-curious
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Dirk http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti99/advancepgm.html
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: New book by Sarfatti "The Theory of Everything for Everyone" soonto be released
  • From: em
• Re: Dirk http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti99/advancepgm.html
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Inquisition
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: My new physics hero...
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• The Inquisition
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Goebel / Rove
  • From: sue jahn
• Full faith and credit of the US Government
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Sue...
• Dirk http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti99/advancepgm.html
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is BaT, exactly?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: sue jahn
• Energy
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Pound-Rebka
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Caltech Football Team
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
  • From: Curious
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Harry
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Harry
• Re: My new physics hero...
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: xxein
• Re: My new physics hero...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Jack Martinelli
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: My new physics hero...
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Eickmeier fails to stop Hammond
  • From: TMG
• Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: xxein
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: People of Faith
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space
  • From: mot12345
• People of Faith
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Golden Number linked to 666
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: Golden Number linked to 666
  • From: Oisin Grehan
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: My new physics hero...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• O'Barr comments (globarr):
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: TC
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: David Johnson
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: harry
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: harry
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: harry
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Harry
• Re: MMX and Zeno
  • From: riedt1
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: My new physics hero...
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Jack Martinelli
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• My new physics hero...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: greywolf42
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: greywolf42
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: greywolf42
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: greywolf42
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: greywolf42
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Bilge
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Bilge
• Sirus b aging
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Jack Martinelli
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  • From: Strael Nosduj
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Time Travel, Saigon "Watching George Bush Trying to Pull a Rabbit Out of His Hat"
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Postulates of Relativity and The Cosmic Background - Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Beginning ?
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
  • From: Dr ***