Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: aphidias@xxxxxxxxxx (Strael Nosduj)
- Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 17:26:04 GMT
On Sun, 01 May 2005 Paul Stowe wrote:
> There are many specific detail problems in the page you referenced. Barry
> took the time & effort to point many of these out.
The series of (rather demented and, one notices, thoroughly refuted)
posts you referenced by "Barry" (greywolf42?) do not even pertain to
the web page I gave you, they refer to a different page on the same
site, called Lesages Shadows. The page I referred you to is called
Omni-Directional Flux.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- References:
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: Strael Nosduj
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Prev by Date: Re: How do you know that acceleration is absolute? <eom>
- Next by Date: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Previous by thread: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Next by thread: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|