Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity

"Strael Nosduj" <aphidias@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42745df3.23849625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 Paul Stowe wrote:
> > ...how does one determine the value for µ???
>
> See the referenced web page, which gives the complete derivation in
> detail.

LOL! That pile of pseudo-mathematical diharrea has no derivations at all
for µ.
(Couldn't resist, after Dinky Van der Mumble's post.)

> In brief, one determines the ultramundane flux and the
> absorption (and reflection if you're willing to accept small
> violations of Newton's third law for gravity) necessary to account for
> the observed force of gravity, consistent with the absence of any
> appreciable shielding. This amount of flux and absorption corresponds
> to a specific amount of energy absorption, depending on the speed of
> the supposed ultramundane particles. Lower bounds on this speed are
> then determined, giving lower bounds on the rate of energy absorption.

That silly rant by "Shadow" still contains "equations" that have mixed
units. It would be a failing grade even in high-school physics classes.

And Shadow still doesn't perform a single equation from actual LeSagian
theory. Just simply hand-waving claims.

I guess it's time to do an update on the "Mathpages" farce, again.

--
greywolf42
ubi dubium ibi libertas
{remove planet for e-mail}


.

Quantcast