Re: Golden Number linked to 666




"tito_zoulou" <tito_zoulou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:88315834.0505020941.518b4bb6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Golden Number linked to 666
> Formal Proof needed
>
> Hello,
>
> While working on my websites on 666 Myth ( http://www.666myth.co.nr/
> French = http://www.666mythe.co.nr/ ), on Pope Benedict 16 - Mark
> 666 (
> http://www.chez.com/cosmos2000/Forums/NEWS_MemoryPopeJohnPaul_II.html
> ) and on Isomorphous Triplets (
> http://www.chez.com/cosmos2000/Numbers/IsomorphousTriplets.html ), I
> have found recently direct links between the Beast Number 666 and the
> famous Golden Number Phi, well-known by Pythagoras, Leonardo da Vinci
> ... and in Sacred Geometry, in architecture and many natural
> phenomenons. This unexpected and incredible relation 666 versus Phi
> may constitute a way for the Rehabilitation of 666 !!! ...
>
> First we have this curious relations:
>
> 666 = 7^3 pi (Phi - 1) = 7^3 pi phi or 666 = (6/5) 7^3 Phi
> with pi = 3.141593 Phi = 1.618034 phi = Phi -1 =
> 0.618034 and 7^3 = cubic of 7
>
> Besides, after computing some sinus and cosines [a good online
> Trigonometry calculator available at http://www.1728.com/trigcalc.htm
> ], expressed in Degrees and absolute values, we obtain:
>
> Phi /2 = sin 666º = cos 324º = cos 216º = cos 144º = cos 36º =
> 0.80901699...
> Phi = 2sin 666º = 2cos 324º = 2cos 216º = 2cos 144º = 2cos 36º =
> 1,61803399...
> Phi = sin 666º + cos 216º = sin 666º + cos (6x6x6)º
> Phi = cos 144º + cos 36º = cos [(6+6) x (6+6)]º + cos (6 x 6)º
> Phi = sin 666º + cos 144º = sin 666º + cos [(6+6) x (6+6)]º
>
> But, I am wondering if there could exist formal mathematical proofs
> for this 666 and Golden Number links.
>
> Thanks for advice and help.

The relationships you list cannot be proved. While they are interesting,
the use of equals signs is not justified. These formulae are only close
approximations. For example, 666 ~ 7^3 pi phi. Given sufficient accuracy
of the constants pi and phi it can easily be seen that the right and left
sides
differ by significantly more than the precision of the irrational numbers.
Pi = 3.1415926536... and phi = (5^.5 - 1)/2 = 0.61803398874989... To 11
significant digits, the expression on the right is 665.97258628... While
this result is close, it is obvious that the error is maybe 6 or 7 orders of
magnitude greater than the precision of the irrational numbers. Adding
more significant digits to their representations will not improve this
result.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Arent decimals safely lumped under rationals?
    ... I don't think it's true that Lisp avoids things like floats, substituting another single way of doing things. ... where, of course, DECIMAL-RATIO is the type we've been discussing. ... And we'd need to fight over the digits of precision problem, ... fond memories of whacky Mr. Visco in 9th grade physical science spending a week or two on significant digits (which I think is how I will handle my requirements. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: status of quadruple precision arithmetic in g95 and gfortran?
    ... But, a loop like ... will accumulate the representation error. ... the most significant digits cancel ... precision, using the Intel compiler which supports Real*16 (and ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: its just simple questions..please answer these.
    ... >operations on a calculator. ... >expressed with the precision of the least precise number. ... Your book should discuss 'significant digits' or 'significant ... It is not correct to 'round' intermediate calculations the way I did ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: decimal precision
    ... I know that floats are approximated but I did not ... allowed in single precision floats... ... is a small number that fits easily in 15 significant digits? ... and to explicitely ask for displaying no more than this precision, ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)
  • Re: Weights & Measures + Temperature
    ... Remember significant digits? ... But the point I was responding to is "1 deg of F will be more ... > precision in both cases is one unit degree. ... > Perhaps a better example would be comparing 212 degrees F to 100 degrees ...
    (rec.crafts.brewing)