Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: "TC" <tclarke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 May 2005 05:17:53 -0700
Paul Stowe wrote:
> ... The equation derived empirically for heating is,
empirically? No theory?
> -(UA/MC)t
> q' = kM/r(1 - e )
>
> Where U is the overall heat transfer coefficient
> A is the radiating surface area
> M is the mass
> r is a spherical body's radius
> C is the heat capacity
> t is time since creation
> k is an emperically determined LeSagian constant ~2.4E-19
> q' is Power per unit area
> As t -> oo this becomes simply,
> q' = kM/r
Once again the problem is that this is incompatible with
Slabinski or any other LeSage/Fato theory in which provides
heat on a per unit mass basis.
Mass is M - no dependence on r.
Area is 4pi r^2
so to be compatible with Slabinski et al your expression
should read
q' = KM/r^2
[pi etc goes into little k to big K switch]
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- References:
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: Strael Nosduj
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: Strael Nosduj
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Prev by Date: Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
- Next by Date: Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Previous by thread: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Next by thread: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Index(es):