Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
- From: "Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 May 2005 19:55:06 -0700
In <1115163357.718695.192400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sue.. <suzysewns...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Both twins count equal rotations of Jupiters moons.
>
>-----
>Jet Propulsion Laboratory
>-----------------------------------------------
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> comments:
What is with all this JPL stuff? Do you know
Wayne Lee?
Look, Sue, you are right, our physical reality
rules. No math, no SR math, can ever violate
physical reality. If any two twins leave a common
point, and then returns to the same or some other
common point, upon their return, the same reality,
and the same change in that reality, will have to
have been seen and observed by both. This physical
law stands above all other math laws and math
principles.
Therefore, there are situations where your
statemen: 'Both twins count equal rotations of
Jupiters moons,' has to be correct. But if these
twins are in different frames, one frame that
included this planet, and one moving at high velocity
past this planet, there will be seen a difference in
the rate of the counts, while they are in these
different frames.
Were you saying all this for a reason? Do you
want to change any of the facts I have listed for the
twin paradox? Are you with me or against me? Speak
up! Now is the time to do something correct!
Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>
+ Remove 3 dots for e-mail.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
- From: Bilge
- Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
- References:
- O'Barr comments (globarr):
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
- From: Sue...
- O'Barr comments (globarr):
- Prev by Date: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Next by Date: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Previous by thread: Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
- Next by thread: Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading