Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
- From: "AllYou!" <idaman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 08:47:46 -0400
"sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:427870df$0$79457$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Unless you relate it to energy/mass
>
> Complex numbers are useful abstract quantities that can be used in calculations and
result in physically meaningful solutions.
> However, recognition of this fact is one that took a long time for mathematicians to
accept. For example, John Wallis wrote, "These
> Imaginary Quantities (as they are commonly called) arising from the Supposed Root of a
Negative Square (when they happen) are
> reputed to imply that the Case proposed is Impossible" (Wells 1986, p. 22).
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ComplexNumber.html
Hey moron, we're all waiting FOR YOUR REPLY TO MY REPLY TO YOUR QUERY OF ME.
.
- References:
- Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
- From: sue jahn
- Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
- Prev by Date: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Next by Date: Re: Pound-Rebka
- Previous by thread: Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
- Next by thread: Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|