Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity

From: aphidias@xxxxxxxxxx (Strael Nosduj)
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 13:32:22 GMT

On 4 May 2005 05:46:52 -0700, "TC" <tclarke@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Now you have to tackle the binary pulsar, deflection of
>light by the sun, gravitational redshift ...

... the gravitational attraction between material bodies...

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: Paul Stowe

References:
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: Strael Nosduj
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: Strael Nosduj
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: TC
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: TC
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
  - From: TC

Prev by Date: Re: Pound-Rebka
Next by Date: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
Previous by thread: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
Next by thread: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread