Re: The big bang.
- From: "Len Gaasenbeek" <gaasbeek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 17:38:06 -0400
"AllYou!" <idaman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vuydndqWhoVrZuXfRVn-jg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Len Gaasenbeek" <gaasbeek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:i-WdnYLf1NKFa-XfRVn-tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > THE BIG BANG.
> >
> > Just because the stars and planets etc. seem to be moving away from us
does
> > not mean that the universe started from a single point or singularity.
Not
> > only does this scenario not explain how the universe was created out of
> > nothing at a given point in time and space, but who or what initiated
the
> > process nor what existed before the big bang.
> >
> > Consequently I would like to propose that infinite space always existed
> > because to say that it didn't begs the question, what was there in the
place
> > of the none existing space? Similarly, time has always existed and will
> > continue to flow at a constant rate, because events or the lack thereof,
> > don't affect the flow of time. In addition I would like to propose that
> > mass and energy have always existed, because they too could not have
been
> > created out of nothing.
> >
> > So how do we explain that all the heavenly bodies seem to be moving away
> > from us?
> > I would like to propose that the universe is indeed in an expanding mode
> > (phase) but that eventually it will reverse direction and once more
begin to
> > collapse. It will continue to do so until all the mass in the universe
is
> > compressed into a small volume, at which point in time it will explode
once
> > more into the next big bang.
> >
> > Since most things in the universe are cyclical like, civilizations,
plants
> > and animals, species, night and day, months, years, winter and summer,
life
> > and death, stars and planets etc., it shouldn't come as a surprise that
the
> > universe is cyclical too. Moreover this has always been the case and
will
> > continue to be so because it makes more sense than anything else I can
think
> > off. I suppose we could call the cosmic total God, who always existed,
is
> > eternal, everywhere at once, infinite and who continues to evolve or
unfold,
> > i.e. She is the continuous creator or driving force of the cosmos.
> >
> > It follows from the above that we are all part of God and contribute to
the
> > continuous evolution of mankind (during its duration) for better and/or
> > worse, during our short stay on earth.
> >
> > And so everything comes full circle and is recycled as part of multiple
> > interlocking cyclic patterns; cycles within cycles, within cycles,
within
> > cycles, ...... at infinitum.
> >
> > Enjoy, Len.
>
> Neither time nor space exist as anything physical. They are both simply
math
> constructs...........inventions of the human mind. There is only one
*substance*, and it
> flows from a state of energy to matter and back again at will.
>
> Have you ever been able to observe a quantity of space? Put your mind in
a situation
> where there are no objects. How do you observe space? How would you
measure it? Space
> is the intellectual construct used to conceptualize the absence of
anything.
...................................................
To AllYou (?),
If I have a cube, one foot square, made out of *** metal, I can say that
the space inside is
one cubic foot.
If I leave home at 1 pm and return at 2 pm, I can say that I was away for
one hour.
Just because until recently man had never been able to observe the back of
the moon
didn't mean that it didn't exist.
Similarly, just because you have never observed the Moonlight Sonata doesn't
mean that it doesn't exist.
Also, just because you can't observe love doesn't mean that a man and woman
can't fall in love.
And similarly, just because I observe a star in the sky doesn't mean that it
still exist. If it is a thousand light years away from me, it could have
blown up a thousand years ago.
And then there are my memories, unseen by all outside observers. At 74
years of age, they sometimes appear more real to me than the present!
"When you are old and grey and full of sleep,
And nodding by the fire, take down this book,
And slowly read, and dream of the soft look
Your eyes had once, and of their shadows deep..."
W.B. Yeats
When you are Old.
Len.
.............................................
> Have you ever been able to observe time? Put yourself in a situation
where there are no
> processes to observe. How would you observe time? How would you measure
it? Time is the
> intellectual construct used to conceptualize the absence of any process.
>
> You're on a fools errand with your post.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The big bang.
- From: AllYou!
- Re: The big bang.
- References:
- The big bang.
- From: Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: The big bang.
- From: AllYou!
- The big bang.
- Prev by Date: Re: O'Barr & Jupiter's revolving moons
- Next by Date: Re: Ken S. Tucker. Time is an imaginary axis
- Previous by thread: Re: The big bang.
- Next by thread: Re: The big bang.
- Index(es):