Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
- From: Dag Oestvang <dagost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 18:08:11 +0200
Tom Roberts wrote:
The only possible "proof" of the nonexistence of black holes is an exhaustive search of the universe. Good luck....
You are mistaken. The existence of black holes depends on the validity of GR (or some similar theory). Evidence against GR is potentially evidence for the nonexistence of black holes.
As a straightforward analogy; the "proof" of the nonexistence of Newtonian black holes does not come from "an exhaustive search of the Universe", but rather from a number of experiments/observations showing that space-time cannot be Newtonian.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
- Prev by Date: Re: The big bang.
- Next by Date: Re: O'Barr comments (globarr):
- Previous by thread: Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations
- Next by thread: Re: A simple proof of the Nonexistance of Black Holes.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|