Re: Bending of light not well authenticated


"Randy M. Dumse" <rmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WDQee.315$Q15.3134@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Koobee Wublee" <kublai@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:WDhde.5100$tQ.2277@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ** K e^(-2 integral[...])
>>
>> Never mind this part. My mistake.
>
> You have worked out the first error is not an error, then.
>
> Okay, so where are we? Do you still hold the second error is still an
> error?
>
>> integral[...] = - sqrt(...) - sqrt(...)
>>
>> Again, taking the derivative of the right hand side does not yield what
>> is on the left hand side.
>
> If that were worked out, would you then hold the Winters derivation was
> complete and sensible?

No. See my other post in thread "Beam me up...".


.