Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- From: "Koobee Wublee" <kublai@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 22:27:22 -0700
"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_6Uee.5225$31.2580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Yes, after a theory makes an assumption, it'd better go back to examine
> the
>> assumption to check its validity.
>
> Maybe maybe not - that depends on if the assumption is checkable or not eg
In another ways, you do not understand what science is all about.
> Kretchman showed the principle of general covariance is not falsifiable -
> it is a heuristic. But from what you write such fine distinctions need to
> wait until you understand the basics.
This is irrelevant to what we are talking about. Stop going off on a
tangent again.
> The POR all by itself implies the existence of an invariant speed.
Let me try one more time to explain this one to you. I want you to open
your eyes this time and stop daydreaming about any abstract whacko stuff.
Lorentz Transform as is fails if the two frames of references have their own
values of the speed of light in vacuum in the first place regardless of how
fast the relative speed of each frame is from the other. Get it?
> Conservation of charge implies that speed should be the
> speed of light. If the speed of light is not exactly the same in all
> inertial frames then all it means is that charge is not exactly conserved
Although the number of electrons are conserved, who said the strength of the
charge is independent of the frame's local speed of light. Do you want to
prove to me mathematically that the strength of charge is independent of the
speed of light? I can prove to you that the strength of a charge in
dependent of the speed of light.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- From: Curious
- Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- From: Bill Hobba
- Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- Prev by Date: Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- Next by Date: Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- Previous by thread: Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- Next by thread: Re: Beam me up - trying to get a basic understanding of GR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|