Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed

"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1115498745.143289.180860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Bilge wrote:
| > John C. Polasek:
| > >The basic material of our universe came from electrons in the
| "primal
| > >cell" according to, and as defined in Dual Space. You may find it
| of
| > >some interest to see how new fundamental constants lambda and K
| serve
| > >to highlight other relationships. It demonstrates that the model
is
| > >quite complete and as usual require a bit of study. The D and f
| limits
| > >as would apply in QED are clearly defined. It should be mentioned
| that
| > >the ep+ pairs polarize by separation under electric fields and in
| no
| > >other way.
| >
| > Since I've already shown that your theory has to predict pair
| > creation from the electric fields in ordinary nuclei, using your
| > own value for the electric field, your so-called theory is wrong.
|
| Well, historically, unifying Gravity and Electricity
| has been more difficult than first thought.
|
| AE used little "rulers" and "clocks" scattered about
| his g-field, so using a little "dipole", which is a
| spacetime *length* with (-) charge at one end and (+)
| and the other, is reasonable.
|
| When an electric field is applied, the dipole twists.
| That causes them to assume a difference in their
| relative geodesics they had prior to the application
| of the E-field, and the (-) and (+) assume differing
| geodesics in 4D due to a change in E-field.
|
| Suppose we take that a step further, in accord with
| GR, and use Length=(G/c^2)*Mass, such as the Mass of
| the Sun is equal to 1.47 km as you bilge know, and
| yields the deflection of light-rays.
| By reasonable analogy, it's as if the Sun literally
| sucked 1.47 km out of space and time.
|
| That deflection occurs in any direction the light
| ray passes the sun, it's only a function of radius.
| Therefore, the same deflection prediction occurs
| if we were to assume the Sun sucked space a 4D
| volume, 1.47 km in direction of radius and the same
| in time, I'll call a bubble.
|
| At this point we can actually predict a density
| for the bubble, as the mass (Sun) and volume
| (r=1.47 km) are knowns.
|
| For simplicity, following Kaluza, set a finite
| dimension orthogonal to x,y,z,t,
|
| +++++++++++++ (+)charges
| 5th dimension = constant fixed by charge "q"
| ------------- (-)charges
|
| By suitably compressing the upper (+)'s and
| lower(-)'s one stores energy that is electrically
| neutral, and obtain the energy density of the
| vaccum, that the bubble requires.
|
| That a vacuum possess certain electrical
| characteristics such as impedance, and a
| constant propagation of "c" provides reason
| to consider the above. My take is Kaluza's 5D can
| be considered as a 4D nonsymmetric metric, with
| the 5th being a virtual vector, rather like
| i x j = k even in 2D.
| (AE preferred the nonsymmetrical 4D approach and
| I do to, but Kaluza's 5D is a good intro).
|
| It's interesting to note, lengths *perpendicular*
| to the direction of motion are invariant. So that
| the 5th ("q") is independent of dx...dt.
|
| I think much of what Mr. Polasek and Fredifizzx are
| discussing relates to what I have posted, but the
| math is tough, so they use *worded concepts* in place
| of the more formal math that should eventually fallout
| of a discussion.

Yes, I am going to "get there" eventually. ;-)

| I'm learning some new ways to think about things, and
| sharing my viewpoint, and after-all that's what
| *theoretical research* is all about.
|
| Seems if someone engages in *experimental research*,
| that's respectable, but for some reason, *theoretical
| research* (as Shuba distains), draws the ire of some.
| WHY?, same thing except cheaper and done in an open
| forum. Shuba insults Fredi, why? what for?

Hmm... Guess I need to take a look on googlegroups. ;-) Oh, no big
deal. Some people like Shuba are inconsequential to these concepts
anywise. "Brainlocked" I suppose. I have worked with and been tutored
by a professional particle physics theorist that is very open minded
about these kind of concepts and I certainly value what someone like
that has to say much more than someone like Shuba has to say. As soon
as I learn more about GR and some personal issues (mine) are resolved,
we plan on continuing our fundamental physics research together.

| I've tried to show how "dual space" can tie into
| other theories and why John, Fredi and I should be
| able to debate without being insulted, but of course
| thoughtful criticism is welcome.
| Regards
| Ken S. Tucker
| kxsxt

Thanks Ken; your open-minded input and concepts are highly valued. At
least by me.

FrediFizzx

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Electrostatic potential between the Sun and the Earth
    ... > conditions should soon leave the sun with a high ... > positive charge. ... > 3) The initial solar wind should therefore have more electrons than protons ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
    ... >>The basic material of our universe came from electrons in the ... > creation from the electric fields in ordinary nuclei, ... it's as if the Sun literally ... that's respectable, but for some reason, *theoretical ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Electrostatic potential between the Sun and the Earth
    ... The Earth is very nuetral electrostatically so even if the ... Sun had a strong electrostatic field about it, there would be no effect ... ... We know that there is a steady stream of charged particles (mostly electrons ... How much charge would have to be on ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Electrostatic potential between the Sun and the Earth
    ... > Assuming that the sun started off with no net charge, ... > positive charge. ... > 3) The initial solar wind should therefore have more electrons than protons ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Electromagnetic radiation of planets
    ... all protons and electrons forming any physical body, ... Since a planet is constantly being accelerated in its orbit ... around the Sun, ... derivatives, or any even number of spacetime derivatives, ...
    (sci.physics)