Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 15:00:49 -0700
Dear Curious:
"Curious" <anthonyroseuk-curious@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1115494190.447800.294580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Given the definition of a frame of reference in
> space-time with the time co-ordinate = t, are
> you saying that all positions in that
> space-time frame do not necessarily have the
> same time t unless we can prove it by
> measurement???
Review the clock synchronization procedure. It leaves room for
anisotropy in c, as defined by a Lorentz aether. And there is
experimentally NO WAY to remove this ambiguity.
Consequently, (I'm assuming this is Dave Seppalla, again), there
is no way to *know* that t = t_1 is simultaneous for an arbitrary
array of points that I might define, even if those points are at
rest wrt me. Even if they all have synchronized clocks. There.
Is. No. Way. To. Know.
You can set up clocks (_n), you can synchronize them, and have
them send a light pulse at L_n/c seconds before t_0, and sure
enough every clock is seen to have simultaneously done its job.
But that is just the result of good synchronization. It doesn't
provide disallowance of a "we are booking through a Lorentz
aether at a good clip".
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- From: Curious
- Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- References:
- Two photons... relative distance question
- From: Curious
- Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- From: Curious
- Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- From: Jon Bell
- Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- From: Curious
- Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- From: Curious
- Two photons... relative distance question
- Prev by Date: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Next by Date: Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
- Previous by thread: Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- Next by thread: Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|