Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed

On Sat, 07 May 2005 23:45:39 -0500, shuba <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
>> Seems if someone engages in *experimental research*,
>> that's respectable, but for some reason, *theoretical
>> research* (as Shuba distains), draws the ire of some.
>> WHY?, same thing except cheaper and done in an open
>> forum. Shuba insults Fredi, why? what for?
>
>The only problem I have with JunkFizzx is his support of people
>who bash serious researchers and physicists. My position is
>exactly the opposite of having a disdain for researchers. In
>this case, I think it's a healthy sign that he finds Polasek's
>behavior "funky". The junkman can figure out for himself whether
>he wants to act credibly or not. Polasek has decided not to act
>credibly, which was my point in the previous post.
>
>It's an issue of ethics, Ken, an idea which I realize probably
>leaves you uninterested. An open forum is an open forum. You've
>been free to demean physicists and mathematicians who have
>pointed out some of your errors. You're free to post misogyny,
>as you have repeatedly done. And now you want to feign the high
>ground?
>
>
> ---Tim Shuba---
I have no idea what you are grumbling about. I have put up 11 papers,
exposing myself to all manner of contradiction, yet not one peep of
any substance have I heard, .
This #10 paper that shows the properties of Espace' primal cell,
derives new fundamental constants like lambda and omega that allow
definiton of eps0 and mu0 as secondary constants, has shown the
angular momentum is alpha x h, and the magnetic moment to be 4pi x the
Bohr magneton, etc. Besides which as I have shown in #1, the bulk
modulus Y (derived from K) and rho combine for a transmission
velocity of c.
Now how is it exactly that you want me to act credibly?

John Polasek
http://www.dualspace.net
.